Atheists Bad, Christians Good: A Review of “God’s Not Dead”

A smug Christian movie about smug atheists leads to an inevitable happy ending.

Atheists bad, Christians good. That’s my four-word summary of God’s Not Dead.

This anti-atheist movie would be more effective if it didn’t portray every atheist as smug, angry, selfish, obnoxious, and unhappy. In contrast, nearly every Christian is kind, happy, generous . . . well, you get the idea.


The movie’s two protagonists are atheist philosophy Professor Jeffrey Radisson and Christian student Josh Wheaton at fictional Hadleigh University.

Professor Radisson is a bully who on the first day of class uses his bully pulpit to require that each student sign a “God is dead” statement or else convince him that God’s not dead — and, failing that, receive an F in the course. Radisson has been doing this for years, presumably without a complaint from students, other faculty, or administrators. In fact, he is about to become head of the Philosophy Department. He has a live-in girlfriend whom he started dating when she was his student, and he continually berates and belittles her in front of his academic colleagues. She turns to Christianity and finds the strength to get out of this abusive relationship after talking to Pastor Dave (more about him later).

Freshman Josh Wheaton is the only student in Professor Radisson’s class who refuses to sign the “God is dead” statement. Everyone encourages him to sign for the sake of his future career as a lawyer — except for Pastor Dave, who gives Josh the strength to enter Professor Radisson’s lion’s den, armed with Matthew 10:32-33: Whoever acknowledges me before others, I will also acknowledge before my Father in heaven. But whoever disowns me before others, I will disown.”

Radisson allows Josh three consecutive class sessions to make his case for God. Josh wisely requests that the class act as jury, and Radisson agrees. Perhaps Josh knows that most American students, just like their parents, believe in God despite signing the “God is dead” statement. (As a former professor, I think a rare accurate portrayal in the movie is of students who focus primarily on grades and are willing to say anything to improve them.)

In the first session, Josh cites the Big Bang as evidence that God created the universe according to Genesis (“Let there be light”). Despite countless possible rebuttals, Radisson simply quotes physicist Stephen Hawking saying that spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, and why we exist. He then taunts Josh by asking if he thinks he’s smarter than Hawking.

In the second session, Josh refers to Hawking’s comment that philosophy is dead, adding that perhaps their philosophy class shouldn’t exist. Professor Radisson is speechless, though he could have told Josh that Hawking is a physicist, not a philosopher, and that you can be an expert in one field and not in another. (The Hawking quote from Radisson was formerly a question for OnFaith panelists, and here’s what I said then: “As accomplished a cosmologist as Stephen Hawking is, no scientist would ever declare, ‘Hawking said it, I believe it, that settles it.’ Scientists require evidence, not an appeal to authority.”)

A vindictive Professor Radisson later confronts Josh for having the audacity to embarrass him in class and threatens not only to fail him, but also to make sure he never becomes a lawyer. When Josh asks Radisson why he’s an atheist, Radisson replies that his mother died when he was 12, despite his prayers, so Radisson hates God for killing his mother.

In the third and final session, Josh rightly asks Radisson how he could hate a God who doesn’t exist. Again, Radisson has no response. (Real atheists, not the straw men atheists that some Christians invent, don’t hate God any more than they hate the Easter Bunny.) Josh then calls for a student jury vote, and they all agree that “God’s not dead” as a bewildered Radisson leaves the room.

Other atheists in the movie include a snide, self-centered journalist and her atheist boyfriend. When she tells him that she has terminal cancer, he asks why this news couldn’t have waited until the following day because she has just spoiled a nice dinner, and he immediately ends the relationship. She later breaks down while interviewing the Newsboys, a Christian rock group, and they convince her to become a Christian because that will give her hope.

The movie has a happy ending, at least for some Christians, because a car runs over Professor Radisson. Pastor Dave just happens to be nearby and encourages Radisson to become a Christian seconds before he dies.

The most effective way to convert atheists in the movie is not by reason or evidence, but by personal tragedy. Perhaps this will inspire some Christians to pray that atheists contract cancer or undergo some other misfortune, because the film reinforces the “no atheists in foxholes” cliché.

The premise of the movie is ridiculous. Christians and atheists alike would be appalled if an institution of higher learning expected students to sign a “God is dead” statement. Universities that promote critical thinking must not require students or professors to believe a certain way and never question or change their beliefs. But shouldn’t that hold true for both public and Christian universities?

As dogmatic as the fictional Professor Radisson is, he at least gave ample class time to a student who had a different opinion. Not necessarily so at some Christian universities. Perhaps Josh “Wheaton” is meant to represent Wheaton College, a Christian institution where students and faculty are expected to affirm a statement of faith and educational purpose that includes “God created Adam and Eve, distinct from all other living creatures.” It’s not difficult to see how such affirmations of faith might discourage critical thinking.

Charleston Southern University, in my hometown, expects faculty and students to accept core values that include the Bible being inerrant and infallible. Dr. Richard Johnson, a religion professor there, once invited me to debate the existence of God on his campus. However, the university wouldn’t allow it and the debate took place at a nearby church. After the debate, Dr. Johnson asked if he could speak to the secular student group on my College of Charleston campus. I readily agreed, and he also invited me to speak to his religion class. But the day before I was to speak, I was disinvited because his university objected. In an article about the incident in the Charleston Post and Courier, I said it reflects poorly on an academic institution that allows only one point of view.

The God’s Not Dead movie is probably intended for those who believe the myth that Christians in this country are being persecuted. (I suppose that’s why so many politicians hide their Christian beliefs and pretend to be atheists.) At secular universities, students and professors are free to discuss and debate a full range of controversial ideas, including whether God is dead. And that’s a good thing.


Herb Silverman Herb Silverman is founder and President Emeritus of the Secular Coalition for America, author of “Candidate Without a Prayer: An Autobiography of a Jewish Atheist in the Bible Belt,” and Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Mathematics at the College of Charleston.
  • Maggie Ardiente

    Did you see the “American Humanists” bumper sticker on the car of one of the atheist characters? Totally worth seeing that painfully bad movie just for that.

  • Dangerous Talk

    According to the movie, the best thing a Christian can do seems to be to run over an atheist with a car.

  • RichardSRussell

    As a former professor, I think a rare accurate portrayal in the movie is of students who focus primarily on grades and are willing to say anything to improve them.

    Partway thru the semester, voluptuous sophomore Veronique, wearing a low-cut blouse and short shorts, approaches her professor during his office hours and says she’s very worried about her grade in the course.

    “You’re right to be concerned,” says the professor, “you’re currently running a D average and haven’t yet turned in the paper that was due last week, which isn’t going to help.”

    “But professor,” Veronique says tearfully, “I simply must get a good grade in this course. I’d do anything to get one.” As she says this, she frets over the top button on her blouse, which comes undone as she leans forward. “Anything!”

    “What, anything?” asks the professor, cocking an eyebrow.

    “Oh, yes, professor,” murmurs Veronique breathily, while gently stroking her thighs, “anything!“.

    “Good!”, exclaims the professor. “Study!”

  • No_one_significant

    Maybe the best thing all of us should learn from this movie is that none of us should caricature other people… whether Christians or atheists.

    • qxe

      “Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions.”

      -Thomas Jefferson

  • Amy

    This is an excellent review of the movie, and I, too, agree that the premise is ridiculous. One of the skills that we as atheists value is critical thinking, yet this movie showcases dogmatic thinking, the opposite of critical thinking. As an atheist parent, I am raising my children not to be atheists per se, but to be freethinkers. I want them to explore and inquire freely into all subjects, including religion, without regard for any impact their conclusions may have. Of course, I hope they reach the same conclusions I have – that evidence is lacking for any gods, specifically the Christian god – but that conclusion will be theirs to reach. Some may suggest that my raising my children as freethinkers and sharing my humanist values and atheist beliefs is no different than a Christian parent raising her children with her Christian belief system. I disagree. The difference is influence versus indoctrination. I am influencing my children with my beliefs, yes. But in the end, unlike my Christian counterparts, I am not indoctrinating them. I do not tell them WHAT to think and then offer consequences ranging from disappointment on one end to disowning them on the other when they do not think the same way I do. My hope is to offer them tools to teach them HOW to think. This is completely counter to the teachings of the professor in this movie, and I do not feel that this movie fairly depicts most atheists.

    • nwcolorist

      I would have to disagree with you, Amy. There are volumes of information available supporting the existence of God going back many centuries. But one needs to be open to the possibility to appreciate it.

      • Merari

        Ehm. No. There isn’t a shred of evidence. Please provide any that is testable, observable and doesn’t rely on tricks with words.

      • qxe

        “There are volumes of information available supporting the existence of God going back many centuries. But one needs to be open to the possibility to appreciate it.”

        Let me fix that for you:

        “There are volumes of CONJECTURE available supporting the existence of God going back many centuries. But one needs to SUSPEND THEIR FACULTY OF REASON TO BELIEVE IT.”

  • Carstonio

    Who scripted the film, Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins? Their series Left Behind is filled with similar outlandish straw men.

    Silverman is right that media like this panders to fundamentalists’ fantasies of righteous victimhood. The Slacktivist blog uses the term “persecuted hegemon” for this mentality. To such folks, persecution is when a society refuses to treat their religion as the norm or default. I’ve never heard of non-Christians getting offended by store clerks wishing customers Merry Christmas, but I’ve heard many stories about fundamentalist customers getting huffy when clerks wish Happy Holidays.

  • nwcolorist

    I haven’t seen the movie, but watching the trailer, I was reminded of the movie “The Legend of Billy Jack” from the early 70′s. Simple characters, all black and white situations, the script painfully trite. While the highbrow crowd will sniff at it, it will probably appeal to a segment of the public. Be interesting to see how it does financially.

  • Sharon Fratepietro

    Wow! The trailer confirms what is said in this article. Good piece, awful movie.

  • David

    Dear nwcolorist: You state, “…volumes of information available supporting the existing of God” As someone who has an evidence based world view, I’m genuinely interested. Kindly share just one small bit of that evidence. (Kindly make it observable, testable evidence.)

    • D S

      In other words, provide evidence within the narrow terms that I deem acceptable and then maybe, just maybe, I’ll consider it.

      One can’t help but wonder even if God were to suddenly appear in an atheist’s midst whether that would be good enough. I’m guessing probably not.

    • nwcolorist

      The Bible clearly states, throughout the Old and New Testament, that faith in God is the number one criteria for salvation. If we tried to prove the existence of God by scientific, empirical tests, faith wouldn’t be necessary. Jesus told Nicodemus he must be born both of water and the spirit (John 3).

      Since materialists don’t regard the spiritual world as valid evidence, it follows they can never believe in God.

  • qxe

    This sad, sad movie is basically a hideous Jack Chick tract come to life; a ridiculous “After School Special” based on a straw man email forwarded by your fundamentalist grandmother. It contains about as much reasonable thinking as any show ever featuring Glenn Beck.

Read More Articles

Screenshot 2014-04-23 11.40.54
Atheists Bad, Christians Good: A Review of “God’s Not Dead”

A smug Christian movie about smug atheists leads to an inevitable happy ending.

Ten Ways to Make Your Church Autism-Friendly

The author of the Church of England’s autism guidelines shares advice any church can follow.

Valle Header Art
My Life Depended on the Very Act of Writing

How I was saved by writing about God and cancer.

Sociologist: Religion Can Predict Sexual Behavior

“Religion and sex are tracking each other like never before,” says sociologist Mark Regnerus.

The Internet Is Not Killing Religion. So What Is?

Why is religion in decline in the modern world? And what can save it?

Why I Want to Be Culturally Evangelical

I’ve lost my faith. Do I have to lose my heritage, too?

What Is a Saint?

How the diversity of saintly lives reveals multiple paths toward God.

An Ayatollah’s Gift to Baha’is, Iran’s Largest Religious Minority

An ayatollah offers a beautiful symbolic gesture against a backdrop of violent persecution.

river dusk
Cleaner, Lighter, Closer

What’s a fella got to do to be baptized?

Magical Thinking and the Canonization of Two Popes

Why Pope Francis is canonizing two popes for all of the world wide web to see.

Pope Francis: Stop the Culture of Waste

What is the human cost of our tendency to throw away?

chapel door
“Sometimes You Find Something Quiet and Holy”: A New York Story

In a hidden, underground sanctuary, we were all together for a few minutes in this sweet and holy mystery.

Mary Magdalene, the Closest Friend of Jesus

She’s been ignored, dismissed, and misunderstood. But the story of Easter makes it clear that Mary was Jesus’ most faithful friend.

From Passover to Easter: Why I’m Grateful to be Jewish, Christian, and Alive

Passover with friends. Easter with family. It’s almost enough to make you believe in God.

Top 10 Reasons We’re Glad A Catholic Colbert Is Taking Over Letterman’s “Late Show”

How might we love Stephen Colbert as the “Late Show” host? Let us count the ways.

God’s Not Dead? Why the Good News Is Better than That

The resurrection of Jesus is not a matter of private faith — it’s a proclamation for the whole world.

The Three Most Surprising Things Jesus Said

Think you know Jesus? Some of his sayings may surprise you.

Jesus, Bunnies, and Colored Eggs: An Explanation of Holy Week and Easter

So, Easter is a one-day celebration of Jesus rising from the dead and turning into a bunny, right? Not exactly.