Hey Bart Ehrman, I’m Obsessed with Jesus, Too — But You’ve Got Him All Wrong

Why the debate over Jesus’ divinity matters.

Note: This essay is in response to Bart Ehrman’s “Why I Am Obsessed with Jesus.” Both scholars have recently published books about whether or not Jesus believed he was God.

I grew up as a “none.” My family wasn’t particularly anti-religious; we were just not interested in religion. I live in Australia, a very secular country with low church attendance. It has more Buddhists than Baptists. Jesus was a complete non-entity in my suburban world. I am ashamed to say that, growing up as a Gen-Xer in the 80s and 90s, everything I knew about Jesus I learned from Ned Flanders of The Simpsons.

Then a funny thing happened. While serving in the Australian Army, I visited a local church at the invitation of a friend. It turned out to be a fateful encounter. I had all my presuppositions blown away. These Christian folks weren’t the hypocritical, moralizing geriatrics that my parents and primetime TV had warned me about. These ordinary church folks were nice people — and not merely nice, but crazy nice, and they made a big impression on me.

Hanging out with them, I started to learn about Jesus. I read the Gospels and realized that I had been sold a lie. Jesus wasn’t a fiction — he was a historical figure, and if he really rose from the dead, then it was a game changer.

My game changed. I did my homework. I got religion.

After some soul searching, I resigned from the army, went to seminary, and eventually earned my PhD in religious studies. Now I’m a seminary professor who gets to spend his time talking about his one, all-consuming passion: the Lord Jesus Christ.

At one level, this is an academic activity. I’ve written technical monographs about the historical Jesus and presented papers at conferences on esoteric scholarly subjects pertaining to Jesus. I have also contributed to popular-level books about Jesus. I am a Jesus nerd.

HGBJCoverImageMy latest book (a collection of essays co-authored with four other scholars) argues that belief in Jesus’ full divinity was not a later invention, but is rooted in Jesus’ own claims about himself and in the testimony of the early church. We wrote it because . . . well, there is this guy, Bart Ehrman, a professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He converted from being a fundamentalist Christian to becoming an agnostic, and he’s something of a celebrity skeptic. His latest book, How Jesus Became God: The Exaltation of a Jewish Preacher from Galilee, claims that Jesus did not think he was God and that he didn’t rise from the dead. But his disciples thought he did, and on that basis, they thought he was a human being who was made divine. Later, says Ehrman, some like St. Paul thought Jesus was an angel who became human, and later again, some like St. John regarded him a pre-existent being who was incarnated as a man.

I saw big posters for Ehrman’s book at a biblical studies conference in Baltimore last November. Immediately, I knew that my email box would fill up with nervous queries from friends and strangers because some colleague at work had read the book and was trying to explain that the whole “Jesus is God” thing was just a big mistake. So I decided that I’d like to do some preventative pastoral care and try to get a word in before all the hoopla started.

I ran the idea of a quick-time response to Ehrman by some friends who are leading scholars in the field of early Christian studies. They agreed to join me. These guys include Craig A. Evans (Acadia Divinity College, Canada), Simon Gathercole (Cambridge University, UK), Chris Tilling (St. Mellitus College, UK), and Chuck Hill (Reformed Theological Seminary, Florida). HarperOne was gracious enough to allow us to see a pre-pub version of Ehrman’s manuscript, and Zondervan was courageous enough to put our response on a fast-track publishing schedule. We worked hard over the Christmas break to write How God Became Jesus: The Real Origins of Belief in Jesus’ Divine Nature.

Ehrman is a competent historian and a great communicator. We can affirm much of what he says. But he simply gets some things wrong — things like Jesus’ self-understanding, Jewish burial customs under Roman jurisdiction, early Christian claims about Jesus, St. Paul’s remarkably “high” estimation of Jesus, and the Christo-logic of the church’s teachings about Jesus as both fully human and fully divine.

I encourage you to read both books. Regardless of what one thinks about who is right in this scholarly melee, Ehrman and I would both agree on one thing: the debate matters. If Jesus is God, then the story of Jesus is the most important story of them all. If not, then worship of Jesus is at best a fanciful fiction and at worst has engineered the manipulation of our entire civilization. But make no mistake about it. Who Jesus is matters, and each of us needs to respond to the gnawing question that Jesus once posed to his disciples: “Who do you say I am?”

Image via Shutterstock.


Michael Bird Michael F. Bird (PhD, University of Queensland) is lecturer in theology at Ridley Melbourne College of Mission and Ministry in Melbourne, Australia. His is a co-blogger of the New Testament blog "Euangelion," the author or editor of numerous books in New Testament studies, and one of the contributors to "How God Became Jesus: The Real Origins of Belief in Jesus’ Divine Nature—A Response to Bart Ehrman."
  • W Maxwell Cassity-Guilliom

    The focus of this piece is split between two topics that should be distinct from one another but seem to be conflated in your article. First is the question of whether the biblical representation of jesus has him stating or believing that he is god (putting aside how much of the biblical representation is mythical). Second is whether the supernatural claims the bible makes are justifiably believable.

    To me the first question can only become interesting after the second question has been examined. Without the evidence to believe that something supernatural happened, we’re basically debating how best to put words into the mouths of ancient theologians who are possibly mythical.

Read More Articles

Dear Evangelicals, Please Reconsider Your Fight Against Gay Rights

A journalist and longtime observer of American religious culture offers some advice to his evangelical friends.

How Passover Makes the Impossible Possible

When we place ourselves within the story, we can imagine new realities.

This Passover, We’re Standing at an Unparted Red Sea

We need to ask ourselves: What will be the future of the State of Israel — and what will it require of us?

Just As I Am

My childhood conversion to Christianity was only the first of many.

This God’s For You: Jesus and the Good News of Beer

How Jesus partied with a purpose.

Jesus, Bunnies, and Colored Eggs: An Explanation of Holy Week and Easter

So, Easter is a one-day celebration of Jesus rising from the dead and turning into a bunny, right? Not exactly.

Hey Bart Ehrman, I’m Obsessed with Jesus, Too — But You’ve Got Him All Wrong

Why the debate over Jesus’ divinity matters.

shutterstock_127731035 (1)
Are Single People the Lepers of Today’s Church?

In an age of rising singlehood, many churches are still focused on being family ministry centers.

Mysterious Tremors

People like me who have mystical experiences may be encountering some unknown Other. What can we learn about what that Other is?

Five Bible Verses You Need to Stop Misusing

That verse you keep quoting? It may not mean what you think it means.

What C.S. Lewis’ Marriage Can Tell Us About the Gay Marriage Controversy

Why “welcome and wanted” is a biblical response to gay and lesbian couples in evangelical churches.

How to Resolve Conflict: A Bible Lesson for Foreign Policy Leaders

The biblical story of Abigail shows how visible vulnerability can create a path toward peace.