When pride overruns the common good

Andrew Harrer / Bloomberg Rep. Dennis Ross (R-Fla.) recently admitted that the government shutdown continues not for achievable policy goals, … Continued


Andrew Harrer / Bloomberg

Rep. Dennis Ross (R-Fla.) recently admitted that the government shutdown continues not for achievable policy goals, but because of pride.

“Republicans have to realize how many significant gains we’ve made over the last three years, and we have, not only in cutting spending but in really turning the tide on other things We can’t lose all that when there’s no connection now between the shutdown and the funding of Obamacare.”

“I think now it’s a lot about pride,” Ross added.

Reinhold Niebuhr, a 20th century Christian theologian who often wrote on power and politics, would certainly agree, and at some length. Niebuhr actually distinguished among four different types of pride.
The Nature and Destiny of Man, Vol. 1
(pp. 186 ff). Niebuhr, in this book, is trying to bring the full sweep of Christian reflection on the human condition into the challenges of a decade of economic depression and a rising international threat from Nazism and Fascism.

In this work, Niebuhr posits that human beings are caught between their freedom and their finitude. This produces anxiety, and anxiety is a fertile soil for the growth of sin, especially egotistical self-assertion in individual and collective life. Egotistical self-assertion can be summed up, for Niebuhr, in the word pride. This is “man’s” basic sin: the unwillingness to acknowledge creatureliness and to insist on self-elevation.

Quoting Reinhold Niebuhr is nearly a cottage industry these days. Niebuhr is a favorite on both sides of the aisle in Washington D.C. From President Obama to Senator John McCain, Niebuhr has become the “Philosopher of the Post-9/11 Era”.

This begs the question of why Niebuhr is so popular among politicians in the 21st century. I think this is often because politicians forget to do what Niebuhr himself did best: analyze the historical context. They simply sift through the corpus of Niebuhr’s work and lift out what they like, devoid of context.

For example, Niebuhr’s contextual theology outraged his Cold War disciples when he accurately assessed the dangers of the Vietnam War. “One neocon Niebuhrian, Paul Ramsey, famously lamented that in the political climate of the 1960s ‘even Reinhold Niebuhr signs petitions and editorials as if Reinhold Niebuhr never existed.’” Niebuhr saw what Ramsey did not; the context had changed in regard to Vietnam.

Niebuhr was, in fact, a “contextual” theologian, meaning that he took the particular historical contexts in which individuals and societies find themselves as critical for theological reflection.

It can seem that Niebuhr’s thought on the “sin of pride” is tailor-made for today’s context of government shutdown and the failure, to this point, to achieve a “rough justice.” Fallible human beings, according to Niebuhr, confuse their own partial view of the good with perfection. Thus their own pride and selfishness lead them to refuse to compromise.

But there is more than this main Niebuhrian theme that can contribute to a way forward, and this can be found in critiques of Niebuhr and his overemphasis on pride. “Pride” is certainly one form of sin, but in my view, this current context is more theologically complex than that. One critique of Niebuhr, first put forward by Valerie Saving and continued by Judith Plaskow is that Niebuhr overemphasized the sin of pride, and this was irrelevant, even harmful, for women. Indeed, “sin for women” is more the failure to be a self, to have pride.

The failure to be a self can be relevant to some women’s experience, but it may also be more broadly relevant to this current Washington gridlock. Overall, as John Bennett, Niebuhr’s colleague and friendly critic noted, “Niebuhr never discussed the traditional sin of sloth. Thus the sin of the weak man who needs some discipline is unaccounted for in his categories.” Men as well as women can find themselves in this condition.

The “sin of the weak man” is directly relevant to why we may be stuck in Congress, and perhaps how we can move forward.

There are many levels to our current political context, and the “will-to-power” is not always the sticking point. There is also a diffuseness to some, both individually and collectively, a seeming lack of a coherent self.

I heard an echo of this problem in a statement by conservative Rep. Marlin Stutzman, R-Ind.

“We’re not going to be disrespected,” he said, adding, “We have to get something out of this. And I don’t know what that even is.”

That statement speaks of diffusion to me, a lack of coherence. But the most important statement, for going forward, is the fear of being “disrespected.” President Obama mocked Rep. Stutzman’s statement. Clearly frustrations are running high.

But in fact, I think Rep. Stutzman’s statement contained clues to a way out that the President is overlooking.

From Just Peacemaking work, I know that to settle a conflict, all parties need to feel they have been given respect even if they don’t get want they say they want, or even when they don’t even seem to know what they want.

Respect, the need to be seen as a coherent self, a person worthy of regard, is one of the deepest human needs there is. It is a need beyond any particular policy prescription.

Getting and receiving respect is the way out. Can we get there from here?

Perhaps you want to say, “You first!”

That’s not how Just Peacemaking works.

Rev. Dr. Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite is Professor of Theology and immediate past President at Chicago Theological Seminary. Her most recent works include Dreaming of Eden: American Religion and Politics in a Wired World , a book that uses Reinhold Niebuhr’s thought, in part, to interpret the anxieties of the Internet age, and Interfaith Just Peacemaking: Jewish, Christian, and Muslim Perspectives on the New Paradigm of Peace and War
.

About

Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite Rev. Dr. Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite is Professor of Theology and immediate past President of Chicago Theological Seminary. She is also a Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress. Her most recent books are "#OccupytheBible: What Jesus Really Said (and Did) About Money and Power" and, as contributor and editor, "Interfaith Just Peacemaking: Jewish, Christian, and Muslim Perspectives on the New Paradigm of Peace and War."
  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous

Read More Articles

egg.jpg
Jesus, Bunnies, and Colored Eggs: An Explanation of Holy Week and Easter

So, Easter is a one-day celebration of Jesus rising from the dead and turning into a bunny, right? Not exactly.

shutterstock_186566975
Hey Bart Ehrman, I’m Obsessed with Jesus, Too — But You’ve Got Him All Wrong

Why the debate over Jesus’ divinity matters.

SONY DSC
Dear Evangelicals, Please Reconsider Your Fight Against Gay Rights

A journalist and longtime observer of American religious culture offers some advice to his evangelical friends.

shutterstock_186090179
How Passover Makes the Impossible Possible

When we place ourselves within the story, we can imagine new realities.

This Passover, We’re Standing at an Unparted Red Sea

We need to ask ourselves: What will be the future of the State of Israel — and what will it require of us?

shutterstock_185995553
How to Debate Christians: Five Ways to Behave and Ten Questions to Answer

Advice for atheists taking on Christian critics.

HIFR
Heaven Hits the Big Screen

How “Heaven is for Real” went from being an unsellable idea to a bestselling book and the inspiration for a Hollywood movie.

shutterstock_186364295
This God’s For You: Jesus and the Good News of Beer

How Jesus partied with a purpose.

pews
Just As I Am

My childhood conversion to Christianity was only the first of many.

shutterstock_127731035 (1)
Are Single People the Lepers of Today’s Church?

In an age of rising singlehood, many churches are still focused on being family ministry centers.

2337221655_c1671d2e5e_b
Mysterious Tremors

People like me who have mystical experiences may be encountering some unknown Other. What can we learn about what that Other is?

bible
Five Bible Verses You Need to Stop Misusing

That verse you keep quoting? It may not mean what you think it means.

csl_wall_paper
What C.S. Lewis’ Marriage Can Tell Us About the Gay Marriage Controversy

Why “welcome and wanted” is a biblical response to gay and lesbian couples in evangelical churches.