Ryan Anderson’s uphill fight to change young minds on gay marriage

Ryan Anderson has planted himself on arguably the most unpopular stance for his generation: opposing gay marriage. At 31, Anderson … Continued

Ryan Anderson has planted himself on arguably the most unpopular stance for his generation: opposing gay marriage.

At 31, Anderson has become one of the leading voices in the

“millennial” generation against the legalization of gay marriage. With the upcoming Supreme Court decisions on gay marriage, his ideas have been circulated in conservative circles, giving him an influence beyond his years.

“Debating marriage is probably not what I would have chosen,” said Anderson, a fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation in Washington. “It’s the question that most likely gets you kicked out of your law firm.”

Anderson’s path began as a research assistant to Robert P. George, a Princeton professor who’s been called “this country’s most influential conservative Christian thinker” by The New York Times.

“Ryan is on his way to establishing himself as the leader on those of the conservative side of the spectrum,” George said. “He is both brilliant and brave, a powerful combination for a young and emerging public intellectual.”

CNN’s Piers Morgan invited Anderson to debate same-sex marriage on his show, but seated him in the audience, not at a table alongside gay financial guru Suze Orman. The idea was to get Anderson to debate from a distance. “He held more than his own, kept his composure and answered their abuse with arguments,” George said.

In brief bullet points, Anderson offers three reasons why he opposes gay marriage:

1)   There would be no government institution that defends the idea that children deserve both a mother and a father.

2)   The redefinition of marriage won’t stop with gay marriage.

3)   The impact it could have on religious liberty and rights of conscience for opponents.

But proponents of gay marriage like Jonathan Rauch, a guest scholar at the Brookings Institution in Washington, find the arguments ineffective. According to the Pew Research Center, support for gay marriage has jumped from 33 percent to 51 percent over the past 10 years. Among Anderson’s millennial generation, that figure hits 70 percent.

“If you look at the way the polls are going, the way politics are changing, it’s pretty clear that the wind is not blowing in their direction,” Rauch said. “I don’t think they’re winning the argument, though they’ve made it in an articulate way.”

Together with Princeton Ph.D. candidate Sherif Girgis, George and Anderson released “What Is Marriage?: Man and Woman: A Defense,” a 150-page book that has become go-to material for conservatives looking to argue against gay marriage. The trio also wrote a similar article for the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy.

Like his Princeton mentor, Anderson is a devout Catholic — a factor that influences his thinking and arguments.

“Ryan’s Catholicism gives him a special bent toward not just having theological views but trying to get to the deep naturally available rationale for those views,” Girgis said. “He combines a deep appreciation of the role of religion in society with the sense of the special value and possibility of reasoned arguments for his conclusions.”

Anderson’s influence crosses over into some evangelical camps. He gave the commencement address at Regent University, founded by religious broadcaster Pat Robertson, and appeared on this month’s cover of Focus on the Family’s CitizenLink magazine.

His evangelical friends say he often half-teasingly encourages them to convert to Catholicism.

“Ryan is kind of evangelical in his Catholicism,” said Eric Teetsel, an evangelical who heads the Manhattan Declaration, a movement that focuses on marriage, sanctity of life and religious freedom. “He is a true believer and wishes the rest of us would come on board.”

When he was a 29-year-old assistant editor at the conservative Catholic journal First Things,  Anderson was a leading candidate to head the financially struggling magazine. Both parties decided it was too soon.

Anderson is now a doctoral candidate at the University of Notre Dame. He is developing a thesis on economics and the common good, one he says avoids the popular categories of social welfare or libertarianism.

Vincent Munoz, a political science professor at Notre Dame, said Anderson is one of the brightest students he has ever met. “He possesses a remarkable ability to translate philosophical principles into public arguments,” Munoz said. “Faith is certainly an integral aspect to Ryan, but his arguments are grounded in philosophical reasoning.”

Anderson’s thesis, however, has taken the back burner to the issue of marriage, an issue he sees as in urgent need of defense. “Even though I don’t like talking about it in social situations, I will,” Anderson said. “We have to explain it in a way that makes sense.”

It’s a question he’s addressed at congressional hearings, lectures at law schools and in media interviews following President Obama’s public support for same-sex marriage and the Supreme Court’s hearings on two gay marriage cases.

Poll numbers that favor the other side don’t dissuade his activism. With a cheerful disposition, he indicates long-term optimism.

“People called Marxism, socialism, the Equal Rights Amendment, now abortion rights inevitable,” he said. “I don’t think anything in life is inevitable.”


Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Religion News Service LLC.


Sarah Pulliam Bailey | Religion News Service Sarah Pulliam Bailey is a national correspondent for Religion News Service.
  • leibowde84

    This guy is full of it. He has no evidence beyond speculation to back up his points.

    1)Â Â There would be no government institution that defends the idea that children deserve both a mother and a father. Rebuttal: Yest there is. It’s called child support and family law. And if your point is that ever child needs or is better off with a mother and father, that has been proven false.

    2)Â Â The redefinition of marriage won’t stop with gay marriage. Rebuttal: Why do you think that? No one is asking for anything more than the right for 2 human beings to get married. There is actual foundation for believing that polygamy and incest are wrong, but no one has presented any real evidence, beyond speculation, that homosexuality is any worse for children or society than heterosexuality.

    3)Â Â The impact it could have on religious liberty and rights of conscience for opponents. Rebuttal: People are free to believe whatever they want. Their actions, and inactions, however are governed by law. The term “marriage” has nothign to do with religion. It is a legal term applying only to civil status. “Holy matrimony” on the other hand, is a religious term, which is not in question now.

  • marcluxjd

    Spot on! I question Jonathan Rauch when he compliments Anderson as “articulate”. I hope that’s something southern ladies insincerely say to avoid saying something too honest, like — his positions are based on false assumptions and completely devoid of logic.

Read More Articles

This God’s For You: Jesus and the Good News of Beer

How Jesus partied with a purpose.

Jesus, Bunnies, and Colored Eggs: An Explanation of Holy Week and Easter

So, Easter is a one-day celebration of Jesus rising from the dead and turning into a bunny, right? Not exactly.

Hey Bart Ehrman, I’m Obsessed with Jesus, Too — But You’ve Got Him All Wrong

Why the debate over Jesus’ divinity matters.

Dear Evangelicals, Please Reconsider Your Fight Against Gay Rights

A journalist and longtime observer of American religious culture offers some advice to his evangelical friends.

How Passover Makes the Impossible Possible

When we place ourselves within the story, we can imagine new realities.

The Three Most Surprising Things Jesus Said

Think you know Jesus? Some of his sayings may surprise you.

How to Debate Christians: Five Ways to Behave and Ten Questions to Answer

Advice for atheists taking on Christian critics.

Heaven Hits the Big Screen

How “Heaven is for Real” went from being an unsellable idea to a bestselling book and the inspiration for a Hollywood movie.

This Passover, We’re Standing at an Unparted Red Sea

We need to ask ourselves: What will be the future of the State of Israel — and what will it require of us?

Just As I Am

My childhood conversion to Christianity was only the first of many.

shutterstock_127731035 (1)
Are Single People the Lepers of Today’s Church?

In an age of rising singlehood, many churches are still focused on being family ministry centers.

Mysterious Tremors

People like me who have mystical experiences may be encountering some unknown Other. What can we learn about what that Other is?

Five Bible Verses You Need to Stop Misusing

That verse you keep quoting? It may not mean what you think it means.

What C.S. Lewis’ Marriage Can Tell Us About the Gay Marriage Controversy

Why “welcome and wanted” is a biblical response to gay and lesbian couples in evangelical churches.