Fear of flying: Cancer v. flight delays

(Elaine Thompson/AP) Imagine you are taking a Christian ethics class, and as your professor I give you this multiple-choice question … Continued


(Elaine Thompson/AP)

Imagine you are taking a Christian ethics class, and as your professor I give you this multiple-choice question on a quiz: ‘Which is more ethical: A) turn away cancer patients from needed chemotherapy treatment, or B) decrease airport delays for the flying public?’

If you answered “B” you would get an “F” on the quiz, especially if we were studying the work of John Rawls and his ethical theories of justice as fairness.

Last week, however, Congress chose “B” and got a good grade from the flying public, i.e. wealthier Americans, for being unfair in reversing only a small part of the economic pain caused by the sequester, while leaving the rest of the cuts in place.

Just days ago, our chronically dysfunctional Congress pulled together and in a stunning show of bipartisanship quickly passed legislation to end the sequestration mandated furloughs of air traffic controllers that were causing long waits at airports.

The only actual merit of the sequester, the mindless, across-the-board spending cuts that were supposed to be so abhorrent that Congress would act to avoid them, was that they were mindless. The cuts and the pain were across the board, from the Pentagon to kids kicked off of Head Start. There’s actually no moral parity in that, per Rawls, but it was a kind of shared sacrifice.

Now, Congress has seen fit to repeal just part of the sequester, the part that affects them, long lines at airports, and their wealthier constituents who fly a lot. But they chose to leave unaddressed the truly morally repugnant results of the sequester such as denying chemotherapy to Medicare patients at some cancer clinics.

Let’s review. Which is the more unethical? Causing people to die from lack of chemotherapy due to cancelled funding for treatment, or causing people to wait longer in a line at the airport?

That isn’t really even an ethical dilemma. It’s a moral catastrophe.

Repeal the entire sequester. There is no choice at this point, when the worst effects of these mindless, across-the-board cuts are falling on the sick, the young, the hungry, the pregnant, and the elderly, and the slim cuts that affect members of Congress directly, or their donor constituents, are being repealed.

Austerity, of which the sequester is a version, is not only morally debased, it is bad economics as Robert Reich repeatedly argues. Really, do we need any more evidence than the economic tailspin of Europe and their catastrophically high unemployment rates to recognize that austerity only makes economic recession worse, not better? The continuing conservative adherence to austerity-type economics in the U.S. is political, not economic, as Paul Krugman often argues, and just did again.

Here’s another irony. The deficit is going down, down, down. A combination of lower spending and our soft economic recovery, combined with increased tax revenue, is lowering the deficit. Even the International Monetary Fund thinks sequestration, therefore, poses more a risk to our overall recovery than it is an aid.

Repealing the small part of sequestration that affected Congress itself and the donor class, while letting cancer patients go without chemotherapy, seniors go without meals on wheels, pregnant mothers go without nutritional assistance, and children get kicked out of Head Start programs, is a new low in our debased public morality.

It will likely get worse. Now that Congress and the president have tacitly agreed they can repeal small parts of sequestration without undoing the whole, more pet projects will surely be removed from the sequester piece by piece.

Mark my words. Funding restoration for the Pentagon will surely be placed in that pet project pipeline. Next to flying home to their constituents, making sure spending for war never suffers is close to the hearts of many in Congress.

Consider, by contrast, John Rawls’ famous statement from “A Theory of Justice“:

Read that and weep for the society we have become.

Thistlethwaite is former president of Chicago Theological Seminary (1998-2008) and a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress. She is author, most recently, of “#OccupytheBible: What Jesus Really Said (And Did) About Money and Power.

About

Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite Rev. Dr. Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite is Professor of Theology and immediate past President of Chicago Theological Seminary. She is also a Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress. Her most recent books are "#OccupytheBible: What Jesus Really Said (and Did) About Money and Power" and, as contributor and editor, "Interfaith Just Peacemaking: Jewish, Christian, and Muslim Perspectives on the New Paradigm of Peace and War."
  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous

Read More Articles

shutterstock_186364295
This God’s For You: Jesus and the Good News of Beer

How Jesus partied with a purpose.

egg.jpg
Jesus, Bunnies, and Colored Eggs: An Explanation of Holy Week and Easter

So, Easter is a one-day celebration of Jesus rising from the dead and turning into a bunny, right? Not exactly.

shutterstock_186566975
Hey Bart Ehrman, I’m Obsessed with Jesus, Too — But You’ve Got Him All Wrong

Why the debate over Jesus’ divinity matters.

SONY DSC
Dear Evangelicals, Please Reconsider Your Fight Against Gay Rights

A journalist and longtime observer of American religious culture offers some advice to his evangelical friends.

shutterstock_186090179
How Passover Makes the Impossible Possible

When we place ourselves within the story, we can imagine new realities.

shutterstock_186795503
The Three Most Surprising Things Jesus Said

Think you know Jesus? Some of his sayings may surprise you.

shutterstock_185995553
How to Debate Christians: Five Ways to Behave and Ten Questions to Answer

Advice for atheists taking on Christian critics.

HIFR
Heaven Hits the Big Screen

How “Heaven is for Real” went from being an unsellable idea to a bestselling book and the inspiration for a Hollywood movie.

This Passover, We’re Standing at an Unparted Red Sea

We need to ask ourselves: What will be the future of the State of Israel — and what will it require of us?

pews
Just As I Am

My childhood conversion to Christianity was only the first of many.

shutterstock_127731035 (1)
Are Single People the Lepers of Today’s Church?

In an age of rising singlehood, many churches are still focused on being family ministry centers.

2337221655_c1671d2e5e_b
Mysterious Tremors

People like me who have mystical experiences may be encountering some unknown Other. What can we learn about what that Other is?

bible
Five Bible Verses You Need to Stop Misusing

That verse you keep quoting? It may not mean what you think it means.

csl_wall_paper
What C.S. Lewis’ Marriage Can Tell Us About the Gay Marriage Controversy

Why “welcome and wanted” is a biblical response to gay and lesbian couples in evangelical churches.