The values behind support for path to citizenship for illegal immigrants

Political philosopher John Rawls famously argued that democratic deliberation should aspire not just to political deals based on expediency and … Continued

Political philosopher John Rawls famously argued that democratic deliberation should aspire not just to political deals based on expediency and short-term self-interest (what he called a modus vivendi), but rather to policy agreements based on affirmations of shared values and goals. In our polarized and often paralyzed political environment, this higher aspiration has seemed fully out of reach, especially on important major policy issues. Against all odds, immigration reform is poised to be that rarest of rarities: an issue that enjoys majority support, at the level of both policy and values, across partisan and religious lines.

A major new national survey conducted by Public Religion Research Institute in partnership with the Brookings Institution shows that, given three options, more than six-in-ten (63 percent) Americans support allowing immigrants currently living in the country illegally to become citizens provided they meet certain requirements, compared to 14 percent who support allowing them to become permanent legal residents but not citizens, and 21 percent who say we should identify and deport them. Support for a path to citizenship is remarkably broad, and includes majorities of Democrats (71 percent), independents (64 percent), and Republicans (53 percent), as well as majorities of every major religious group, including more conservative groups such as white evangelical Protestants (56 percent).

It’s clear that the engine of the recent repositioning of the GOP by party leadership is pragmatic, spurred by defeat in the 2012 presidential elections and the growing electoral clout of Hispanic voters. Nearly half (45 percent) of the country, including four-in-ten Republicans and Tea Party members, believe that the GOP’s position on immigration hurt the party in the recent elections. But it’s noteworthy that this political reality check has motivated even some of the staunchest opponents of immigration reform to rethink not only policy but also values. For example, Tea Party standard-bearer Senator Rand Paul, in a remarkable shift, is replacing references to fences and helicopters and an emphasis on deportation with new appeals to the values of “prudence, compassion, and thrift” and at least a strong implication that these values point toward a path to citizenship for the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants currently in the country.

With this values turn, Senator Paul has arrived much closer both to the policies and the values that Americans overall, including rank-and-file Republicans, say should guide immigration policy. Paul’s characterization of these values under the headings of prudence and compassion is not far off the mark in describing the values Americans say are most important guides to constructing immigration reform policy. Related to prudence, approximately eight-in-10 say the values of promoting national security (84 percent), ensuring fairness to taxpayers (77 percent), and enforcing the rule of law (77 percent) are extremely or very important values. At the same time, Americans rate values related to compassion roughly as high: 84 percent cite keeping families together, and 82 percent name protecting the dignity of every person as extremely or very important moral guides for immigration reform policy. Moreover, nearly seven-in-10(69 percent) cite the Golden Rule (defined as “providing immigrants the same opportunities I would want if my family were immigrating to the U.S.”) as extremely or very important.

To be sure, self-identified Republicans are more likely to favor values related to prudence, while self-identified Democrats are more likely to favor values related to compassion on this issue. But in the general population, these partisan differences are relatively modest and look more like differences of accent rather than outright disagreement. For example, 81 percent of Democrats (compared to 94 percent of Republicans) say promoting national security is very important, and 81 percent of Republicans (compared to 88 percent of Democrats) say keeping families together is very important. The new survey data suggests that the significant shift we’re beginning to see among Republican Congressional leaders on policy and values is bringing them into better alignment with rank-and-file Republicans on this issue. If that happens, we may get an immigration reform bill that will present an unusual moment to be savored in a deliberative democracy: where policy outcomes reflect not just political expediency but shared values.

About

Robert P. Jones Dr. Robert P. Jones is the CEO of Public Religion Research Institute and a leading scholar and commentator on religion, values, and public life.
  • NorthernVirginia

    The only values on display are demagoguery and political cowardice.

    The most sensible thing to do is to immediately expel all illegal aliens from our country. It just makes good sense.

  • nottellin1

    Yikes. I was just told by my congresswoman, Maxine Waters, Washington office that they would note my comment disagreeing with immigration reform & amnesty but that it was not “worth their time to discuss it with me”. What!

  • two4three2

    Wow! Good for you for calling. However, we all know that Maxine is all for amnesty and open borders. She doesn’t want to hear about the majority of us who are against it, as she apparently doesn’t believe in representing her true constituents.

Read More Articles

colbert
Top 10 Reasons We’re Glad A Catholic Colbert Is Taking Over Letterman’s “Late Show”

How might we love Stephen Colbert as the “Late Show” host? Let us count the ways.

emptytomb
God’s Not Dead? Why the Good News Is Better than That

The resurrection of Jesus is not a matter of private faith — it’s a proclamation for the whole world.

noplaceonearth
An Untold Story of Bondage to Freedom: Passover 1943

How a foxhole that led to a 77-mile cave system saved the lives of 38 Ukrainian Jews during the Holocaust.

shutterstock_148333673
Friend or Foe? Learning from Judas About Friendship with Jesus

We call Judas a betrayer. Jesus called him “friend.”

shutterstock_53190298
Fundamentalist Arguments Against Fundamentalism

The all-or-nothing approach to the Bible used by skeptics and fundamentalists alike is flawed.

shutterstock_178468880
Mary Magdalene, the Closest Friend of Jesus

She’s been ignored, dismissed, and misunderstood. But the story of Easter makes it clear that Mary was Jesus’ most faithful friend.

shutterstock_186795503
The Three Most Surprising Things Jesus Said

Think you know Jesus? Some of his sayings may surprise you.

shutterstock_185995553
How to Debate Christians: Five Ways to Behave and Ten Questions to Answer

Advice for atheists taking on Christian critics.

HIFR
Heaven Hits the Big Screen

How “Heaven is for Real” went from being an unsellable idea to a bestselling book and the inspiration for a Hollywood movie.

shutterstock_186364295
This God’s For You: Jesus and the Good News of Beer

How Jesus partied with a purpose.

egg.jpg
Jesus, Bunnies, and Colored Eggs: An Explanation of Holy Week and Easter

So, Easter is a one-day celebration of Jesus rising from the dead and turning into a bunny, right? Not exactly.

SONY DSC
Dear Evangelicals, Please Reconsider Your Fight Against Gay Rights

A journalist and longtime observer of American religious culture offers some advice to his evangelical friends.