Vatican mulling changes to election of new pope

VATICAN CITY — The Vatican on Wednesday (Feb. 20) confirmed that Pope Benedict XVI is considering changes to church law … Continued

VATICAN CITY — The Vatican on Wednesday (Feb. 20) confirmed that Pope Benedict XVI is considering changes to church law regulating the election of a new pope, but stopped short of saying whether voting could start earlier than currently planned.

Pope John Paul II’s 1996 Apostolic Constitution “Universi Dominici Gregis” regulates what happens between the death or resignation of a pope and the election of his successor.

It stipulates that the conclave of cardinals must begin 15 to 20 days after the end of the previous pontificate.

But after Benedict’s surprise announcement that he will resign on Feb. 28, several voices within the church have asked for an earlier start to the voting to shorten the time the Catholic Church is left without a leader.

The Rev. Federico Lombardi, the Vatican’s chief spokesman, said on Wednesday that the pontiff is considering the publication of a decree “to clarify some specific points of the Apostolic Constitution on the conclave that had been pointed out to him in recent years.”

According to Vatican Insider, the religion news portal of the Italian daily La Stampa, Benedict will authorize the cardinals’ assembly that will govern the church after his resignation to vote whether to move up the beginning of the conclave.

Lombardi stressed that he didn’t know whether the pope “will deem it necessary to issue a clarification on the date of the start of the conclave.”

“We’ll see it if and when the document is published,” he said.

Instead, he said some of the changes that Benedict could introduce would “fully harmonize” John Paul’s 1996 rules with another document that lays out in detail the rites to be followed during the conclave.

Benedict already modified the conclave rules in 2007, reversing a previous change that allowed popes to be elected under some circumstances with a simple majority, rather than with a two-thirds majority.

As Benedict’s scheduled resignation approaches, the date of the conclave is only one of the many unanswered questions sparked by the unprecedented change in leadership.

The Vatican is still struggling to define what title the former pope will have, and whether he will be attending the inauguration Mass of his successor.

Each of the issues has potentially far-reaching consequences for the delicate relationship between a living ex-pope and his successor, who will be living a few hundred meters apart within the Vatican walls.

According to a senior Vatican source, the initial reaction to Benedict’s announcement — shock mixed with admiration — is being replaced by “dismay” and even “disappointment.”

The pope’s resignation, though considered in church law, caught the Vatican machine utterly unprepared, and observers say it’s still too early to evaluate its long-term effects.

In an interview with the Italian daily Corriere della Sera on Wednesday, Cardinal Walter Kasper, a respected German theologian and longtime head of the Vatican’s ecumenical office, said that the role of the pope and of the Vatican Curia will have to be reconsidered in light of Benedict’s decision.

The “sacred aura” that has come to surround popes in the last two centuries, Kasper said, “is now somewhat lost.”

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Religion News Service LLC.

More on: ,

  • di89

    If some people hadn’t cultivated this “sacred aura” in the first place, we wouldn’t have this problem.

  • gilhcan

    If the pope plans to make changes that would improve the election of his successor, at least by eliminating those cardinals from the conclave who have participated in the cover-up of raped young people, like Roger Mahony of Los Angeles, he’d better act fast. He only has one week left to do anything. But when one considers the long, long history of corruption in the Catholic hierarchy and the lower clergy, is there any hope?

    Would and changes made just be more of the cover-up? Protecting sinful and criminal cardinals, bishops, and priests in their continuing sins and crimes, in their continuing debauchery of Jesus and his Gospel story. It’s another case in the long history of the deceitful and criminal use of religion, especially in the Catholic Church.

    But the basic question must be asked, why should any single person be given all that power? Nothing in the Gospels signifies that. Nothing even signifies a priesthood, for that matter. The whole problem with Catholic clergy is that the lay People of God play no part in their choice for anything they are assigned from above to do.

  • gilhcan

    And the only people who can bring an end to that falsely “sacred” aura are the lay People of God! Don’t wait for any pope or the hierarchy to do anything. They are protecting their own royal turf. But the lay people allow that clergy to continue, just as the voters in this country continue to hire a Congress that only works for the super-wealthy, does nothing for those who hired them, and spends most of its time on vacation while we continue to spend billions supporting them for doing nothing. Compare Vatican wealth with that! The fault lies with the people who allow such things. Revolt! We must cease being enablers, even enablers of those who rape our kids.