Controversy over Cardinal Mahony’s conclave vote reaches Vatican

VATICAN CITY — The controversy over Cardinal Roger Mahony’s vote in the conclave that will elect a new pope has … Continued

VATICAN CITY — The controversy over Cardinal Roger Mahony’s vote in the conclave that will elect a new pope has now reached the Vatican, with at least one cardinal musing aloud that the former archbishop of Los Angeles should consider staying home.

Mahony, who led the nation’s largest archdiocese from 1985 to 2011, has been accused of hiding sexual abuse by priests and was recently sidelined by current Archbishop Jose Gomez.

Gomez announced that Mahony would no longer have any “administrative or public duties” after a court-ordered release of 14,000 pages of internal church records showed Mahony and others actively tried to shield abusive priests from prosecution. Gomez called the records “brutal and painful reading.”

Nonetheless, the 76-year old cardinal remains a bishop” in good standing” and retains the right to vote for the future pope until he reaches age 80. Gomez has since said he supports Mahony’s vote in the conclave.

On Monday (Feb. 18) Italy’s main weekly, the Catholic magazine Famiglia Cristiana, put the so-called “Mahony affair” on the home page of its website, quoting the petition by left-leaning group Catholic United calling the prelate to “stay home.”

The magazine also asked its readers to share their thoughts on whether Mahony should attend the conclave. Within hours, the magazine received hundreds of answers via its website, overwhelmingly asking the cardinal not to come to Rome.

“Cardinal Mahony should not only stay home from the conclave but retire to a life of prayer in a monastery,” read one typical comment. “It seems inconceivable to me that he doesn’t feel the moral duty to abstain from the conclave,” read another.

By Tuesday, Mahony’s case was on the front page of most of the main Italian newspapers, prompting the first reactions from within the Vatican.

In an interview with the daily La Repubblica, Cardinal Velasio De Paolis, the former head of the Vatican’s Prefecture for Economic Affairs and the pope’s envoy charged with reforming the disgraced Legionaries of Christ, said that “it will be up to (Mahony’s) conscience to decide whether to take part or not.”

De Paolis stressed that there is no formal procedure to stop Mahony from attending the conclave.

“The common practice is to use persuasion. There is no more that can be done. Cardinal Mahony has the right and duty to take part,” he said. “This is a troubling situation but the rules must be followed.”

According to De Paolis, only “someone with great authority” could advise “through a private intervention” that the retired Mahony not take part.

On Tuesday, the Italian news agency ANSA quoted Bishop Gianfranco Girotti, a former No. 3 official at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith under then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, as saying that “if his presence creates difficulties or embarrassment, then I think it could be opportune to renounce.”

“But the decision is up to him and his conscience,” Girotti added.

La Caramella Buona, an Italian group for victims of sexual abuse, also called on Mahony not to attend the conclave.

But in a Monday tweet, Mahony signaled his resolve to come to Rome. “Count-down to the Papal Conclave has begun. Your prayers needed that we elect the best Pope for today and tomorrow’s Church,” Mahony wrote.

The tweet sparked dozens of reactions online, with Twitter users calling his decision “shameful.” ‘’Please recuse yourself for the good of the Church,” asked @bobshineproblem.

In a Monday post on his blog, Mahony also discussed the difficulty of “never rationalizing what is happening in our lives, never protesting misunderstandings, and never getting angry because of false accusations.”

“That is so difficult for us human beings. It is certainly difficult for me on my journey,” he added.

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Religion News Service LLC.


    If you think he will be the only one at the conclave with dirty hands, think again.

  • amelia45

    If Mahony should not vote because he hid the priests and sins of child sex abuse, then neither should Cardinal Rigali of Philadephia fame nor Brady of Ireland. WE have to wonder about all those who were at one time a bishop in a diocese – including Dolan. How many others are also guilty of the same thing who have not been publically rebuked?

    I think Mahony should go to the conclave and vote because what he did is not more egregious than what other cardinals have done. I am appalled at the Church’s willingness to turn Mahony into a convenient whipping boy, the stand-in for all of those who colluded in the cover up in their own dioceses.

  • Carol Medina

    I am outraged that Mr Mahoney would even consider himself a man of the cloth let alone a Vessel of God. To me you are a disgrace without any duties and conscious concerning the Catholic Church. (My Church that I love so much!)

    When you found out about all the pedophiles you should have let law enforcement step in and handle the problem. You or the Vatican are not above the law!! No, instead you decided to look the other way. The horrible men who did these atrocities and the priests or anyone else who knew, should have been excommunicated and punished by the proper channels, LAW ENFORCEMENT. Mahoney, stay out of the Vatican you have lost your privilege. If you go it’s a slap in the face of the church and our blessed Lord.

    Mahoney you are self centered, a disgrace, and as guilty as the pedophiles. Remember you will be judged at the end of your life. You will look into Satins eyes and see all your sins before you and burn in hell! Mahoney , remember you are not above the law of The Lord!

    Carol Medina