Children conceived through rape open new front in abortion culture wars

WASHINGTON — Standing before the throngs at the March for Life on Jan. 25, Ryan Bomberger admitted that he was … Continued

WASHINGTON — Standing before the throngs at the March for Life on Jan. 25, Ryan Bomberger admitted that he was the poster child for one of the most difficult aspects of the abortion debate: his mother had been raped.

“I’m the fringe case that even pro-lifers have a hard time embracing,” said Bomberger, an anti-abortion activist whose mother chose to continue the pregnancy and put him up for adoption.

Forty years after the Roe v. Wade decision legalized abortion, children who were conceived through rape — and women who were raped and chose to end the pregnancy — are speaking out, opening a new front in the often-fraught discussions of a decades-old culture war.

While Bomberger, 41, considers himself a warrior on the front lines of the anti-abortion movement, Jason Lovins sees himself as a worship leader more than an activist.

When he performs with his contemporary Christian band, the 31-year-old shares his testimony of being born after his mother was raped at age 15; he still remembers her high school graduation on his third birthday.

“I was so loved that it never became an issue for me that I was a product of rape,” said the singer, whose Jason Lovins Band has performed with Michael W. Smith and for the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association.

From campgrounds to churches, he has shared his story to encourage women who find themselves in the same situation as his mother to make the same choice she did.

But adult children who were conceived by rape are not the only ones revealing their pasts.

The 1 in 3 Campaign, a project of the abortion rights group Advocates for Youth, has introduced 40 women’s stories in a new book to mark the Roe v. Wade anniversary. Among the stories is one from “Stefanie,” a 51-year-old minister and stepmother who ended up pregnant twice after she was raped at the ages of 18 and 21.

“I chose abortion over suicide. Twice,” she wrote. “Those were the most difficult decisions I’ve ever made. I commemorate them each year with great sadness. But, also, with tremendous gratitude for having had the freedom to make those decisions for myself.”

Julia Reticker-Flynn, manager of the 1 in 3 Campaign that produced the book, said the stories aim to end the shame that comes with abortion — and rape.

“Whether a pregnancy was the result of rape, or a pregnancy was very much wanted and because of dire medical circumstance the person could not carry the pregnancy to term, our stance is that we should not judge,” she said.

Joyce McCauley-Benner, 35, was working her way through college when she was raped by a co-worker. Because she was dating her boyfriend at the time, she did not know until months after her son was born who the father was.

Now, 13 years after her son’s birth, the spokeswoman for the group Feminists for Life chooses not to reveal the information about his father.

“We shouldn’t rank people based on how they’re conceived,” she said. “My child, if he was conceived in rape, that doesn’t make him any less than you if you were conceived by two loving parents.”

McCauley-Benner doesn’t argue that every rape victim should keep a child under such circumstances. But she said stories like hers show that there are no easy answers — even for those who decide to carry the child to term.

“It doesn’t mean that all of a sudden the child is going to make memories even worse, nor does it mean that the child is going to magically heal you,” she said.

Recent statistics on how many pregnancies occur as a result of rape are not readily available. According to the website of the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, about 10,000 to 15,000 abortions occur annually among women whose pregnancies resulted from rape or incest. It also said that some 22,000 pregnancies resulting from rape could be prevented each year if female assault victims had access to emergency contraception.

A 2011 Gallup poll revealed Americans’ mixed feelings on rape and abortion: The vast majority — 91 percent — of those who define themselves as “pro-choice” support abortion being legal when pregnancy was caused by rape or incest. Yet even 6 in 10 (59 percent) of those who call themselves “pro-life” agree with such a policy.

Bomberger, an evangelical Christian, said his inclusion at the January rally — and increased chatter on social media — are signs this issue is getting more attention. His Virginia-based Radiance Foundation aims to “shatter the myth of the unwanted” through campaigns that focus on adopted children, including those who were products of rape.

Michele Dillon, a sociologist at the University of New Hampshire, said the political debates show the absolutes on either side. For those who believe life begins at conception, “life is life and hence abortion should not be an option,” she said. Those supporting abortion rights, meanwhile, are more likely to see the choice as up to the mother “whatever the reason.”

Last year, the role of rape in the abortion debate made an unexpected entrance in two key Senate races; Missouri Republican Todd Akin said women rarely become pregnant in cases of “legitimate rape,” and Indiana Republican Richard Mourdock said a pregnancy that results from rape was “something that God intended to happen.” Both men lost their races.

Though politicians used “inelegant language,” they raised what Susan Wills of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops called “one of the hard cases.”

“These are the tough sells in the public,” said Wills, assistant director for education and outreach at the bishops’ Secretariat of Pro-Life Activities. “It’s very easy for us to convince people that partial-birth abortion or other gruesome late-term procedures ought not to be happening, but when we talk about rape and incest, it’s not a sound-bite issue.”

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Religion News Service LLC.

  • question1

    It’s amazing to me that the debate always begins & ends with the unborn life. Rape abortions, incest abortions…what about the women who must risk their own lives & health to deliver a child? Any child. What about the women’s rights? What about the women’s health? What about the women’s financial/emotional/physical future?

    Women must be allowed to choose whatever they choose. Their choice is between themselves & God alone. For those who call themselves “pro-life” then focus your attention & money on the children who are already here.

    It’s ironic that in the news recently there’s been a huge battle about men & their role in a war, as snipers or soldiers or whatever. The general agreement is that the choice belongs to the soldier as to what their role will be in any war since war is always horrific & the rest of us have no right to judge.

    And so it is with women’s decisions as to whether to bring a life into the world! Whether a human risks their own life & health is THEIR choice.

  • cricket44

    Amen and well said.

  • jimwalters1

    question1,

    The fundamental question when dealing with abortion is the status of the unborn and at least 90% of the abortion debate is people talking past each other on this issue.

    If the unborn is just a lump of tissue in the woman’s body and remains so until the moment of birth then having an abortion is morally equivalent to having a nose job – purely the mother’s own business. If the unborn is a fully fledged human being from conception then killing that human being is morally comparable to killing any other human being – clearly society’s business and something that needs to be severely limited if not completely banned. If the unborn starts as non-human and slowly becomes human it gets even messier. You have to figure out what rights it has at which times.

    Pro-life people aren’t opposed to women doing what they want with their own bodies, they believe it is someone else’s body. Pro-choice people aren’t in favor of killing babies, they think it is not a baby. Until we get a concensus on this issue we will never have an answer on abortion that satisfies everyone. If answering that question were purely a medical issue that would be one thing, but determining what it means to be human goes beyond science into the realms of philosophy and, yes, religion. I can’t see this ever being solved to everyone’s satisfaction.

    The only alternative then is to figure out how to handle abortion in a society where there is no concensus. I still haven’t heard a better compromise than making abortion “safe, legal, and rare”.