‘Lincoln’ rekindles equality

PHOTO BY DAVID JAMES Still of Daniel Day-Lewis in Lincoln. Photo by David James, SMPSP – © 2012 – DreamWorks … Continued


Still of Daniel Day-Lewis in Lincoln. Photo by David James, SMPSP – © 2012 – DreamWorks II Distribution Co., LLC. All Rights Reserved.

On Thanksgiving weekend, with family and friends, I watched Steven Spielberg’s masterpiece “Lincoln.” It was a history lesson on racial inequality. Abraham Lincoln championed the 13th Amendment, abolishing slavery, paving the way for the 15th Amendment in 1869, giving African Americans and other racial minorities the right to vote. The movie also hinted at gender inequality, when nearly all the members of the House of Representatives stood up in protest when one Congressman mentioned that one-day women might be given the right to vote.

But for me, more than teaching a history lesson, the movie rekindled the universal ethic very much emphasized in the Eastern religions of Hinduism, Buddhism, and my own religion of Jainism: equality among all living beings. It also led me to revisit my stance on the divisive political debate about income inequality.


We all agree that all humans are equal, but what about all living beings (animals and plants)? In Western religions, only human beings embody souls, while in Eastern religions all living beings including dogs, cats, ants, elephants and plants have a soul. Eastern religions believe all living beings have an equal soul, each at different stages of spiritual development; each soul is independent and is capable of attaining salvation, which is referred to as being in communion with God or one with God.

Because of the deep belief in the equality of all living beings, Hindus, Buddhists, and Jains promote the practice of vegetarianism, minimizing the harm done to living beings. Some Jains even avoid eating root vegetables in order to refrain from uprooting and killing an entire plant for consumption. This principle of recognizing the equality of all souls also drives the ecological concerns by Eastern religions and our desire to maintain balance with nature and not to harm the environment.


But where does equality end? The debates in the recent presidential election and the earlier Occupy Wall Street protests have made me question if income inequality and “spreading the wealth” are also part of the universal principle of equality. I believe we need to look at income inequality as two parts: equality in opportunity and equality in outcome. Let me explain.

Like many people, I agree that we must provide equality in opportunities for all persons for basic food, education, shelter, employment, and even healthcare. And our government in large part does this through food stamps, public education, housing assistance and Medicaid. The debate often is to what extent.

But when it comes to outcomes: wealth accumulation or high income, our society believes in allowing people to benefit from their hard work and good luck. The debate is often whether we should tax individuals’ wealth and to what extent, not only to offer other less fortunate individuals greater opportunity, but also to compel the wealthy to pay a higher share of their wealth for things that benefit everyone—roads, schools, clean water and air, and safe food.

I do not believe we should try and impose equality of outcomes, where everyone makes the same amount. Historically, different systems of governments have shown us that imposed outcome equality through a Communist or Marxist system has been unsuccessful; instead we must encourage and enable people to use opportunity to improve their outcome. We need to find a balance between the extreme income inequality we have now, and the heavy-hand imposition of income equality in other systems.

At this juncture in my life, the movie “Lincoln,” my religious background and the political debates have helped me to see equality at multiple levels: equality at the spiritual level (souls and living beings), equality at the societal level (gender and race), equality in beliefs (religion and even sexual preference), and equality in opportunity (education and healthcare). We need to evolve towards greater and greater equality.

We have centuries of work ahead of us, but Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Susan B. Anthony, and Martin Luther King Jr., have taken us on the right path towards realizing the universal principle of equality.

Dr. Manoj Jain

is an infectious disease physician in Memphis and a writer whose writings have appeared in

The Washington Post

, the

Commercial Appeal

and the

New York Times



Comments are closed.

Read More Articles

Fundamentalist Arguments Against Fundamentalism

The all-or-nothing approach to the Bible used by skeptics and fundamentalists alike is flawed.

The Three Most Surprising Things Jesus Said

Think you know Jesus? Some of his sayings may surprise you.

How to Debate Christians: Five Ways to Behave and Ten Questions to Answer

Advice for atheists taking on Christian critics.

Heaven Hits the Big Screen

How “Heaven is for Real” went from being an unsellable idea to a bestselling book and the inspiration for a Hollywood movie.

This God’s For You: Jesus and the Good News of Beer

How Jesus partied with a purpose.

God’s Not Dead? Why the Good News Is Better than That

The resurrection of Jesus is not a matter of private faith — it’s a proclamation for the whole world.

An Untold Story of Bondage to Freedom: Passover 1943

How a foxhole that led to a 77-mile cave system saved the lives of 38 Ukrainian Jews during the Holocaust.

Friend or Foe? Learning from Judas About Friendship with Jesus

We call Judas a betrayer. Jesus called him “friend.”

Jesus, Bunnies, and Colored Eggs: An Explanation of Holy Week and Easter

So, Easter is a one-day celebration of Jesus rising from the dead and turning into a bunny, right? Not exactly.

Dear Evangelicals, Please Reconsider Your Fight Against Gay Rights

A journalist and longtime observer of American religious culture offers some advice to his evangelical friends.