For Petraeus, echoes of that other warrior David

It’s tempting to view the sex scandal surrounding retired Army Gen. David Petraeus through a religious lens. After all, most … Continued

It’s tempting to view the sex scandal surrounding retired Army Gen. David Petraeus through a religious lens.

After all, most faiths forbid adultery, and even before his fall from grace, some Pentagon colleagues compared Petraeus to the biblical King David — another proud and powerful warrior.

The comparison seemed even more apt after the former four-star general’s resignation from the CIA on Friday. “More than one officer cited the biblical adultery of King David and Bathsheba,” wrote The New York Times.

The Bible says that David acted righteously and kept God’s commandments — except in the case of Uriah the Hittite, Bathsheba’s husband.

“Will history remember David Petraeus with the same caveat?” asked Jim Denison, a Southern Baptist scholar in Dallas.

Even liberals saw the scandal in religious terms — albeit from an opposite pole.

“Don’t understand why ‘adultery’ is quasi-illegal in a nation in which church & state are separate,” tweeted the renowned novelist Joyce Carol Oates. “The ugly word ‘bastard’ has been phased out of usage & next should come ‘adultery’ with its Biblical rectitude & cruelty.”

But the military’s anti-adultery rules are not based on religion, biblical or otherwise, said Lt. Col. Todd Breasseale, a Pentagon spokesman.

“To be clear, it has nothing to do with a religious version of what morality is and everything to do with maintaining good order and discipline,” he said.

Article 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice criminalizes adultery when three elements are met: two people had sex, one of them was married, and their conduct compromised military discipline and order or brought “discredit upon the armed forces.”

The rules may seem archaic to modern Americans, but they are essential to the military, where officers and soldiers entrust their lives to each other, Breasseale said.

Imagine if a senior officer was having an affair with an enlisted soldier’s spouse. “His decision-making would rightly be second-guessed,” Breasseale said, “and that would cause a ripple-effect through the unit.”

Bible readers may remember that King David ordered his troops to abandon Uriah on the battlefield so that the cuckolded husband would be killed, surely a worst-case scenario.

As in civilian America, extramarital affairs are fairly common in the military, experts said, as soldiers spend long tours of duty stationed far from home. Adultery tends to be prosecuted only when the conduct is egregious, when it accompanies other crimes like sexual misconduct, or when a high-ranking officer is involved.

“It’s hard to make the case when I’m representing a senior military officer on adultery that the good order and discipline of the unit was not affected,” said Victor M. Hansen, a professor at New England Law in Boston. For 15 years, Hansen served as an Army Judge Advocate General and later represented accused officers in military courts as a defense attorney.

What’s more, the military prides itself on maintaining high moral standards. Soldiers can still be prosecuted for “conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentlemen,” after all.

“We’re asked to do the nation’s hardest work,” Breasseale said. As it conducts dangerous missions, the military needs soldiers who follow orders and officers with uncompromised ethics, he said.

There’s little chance Petraeus, the most heralded officer of his generation, will face adultery charges, said military law experts. For one thing, the ex-general retired from the Army to take the CIA post. A former Petraeus spokesman says the affair began after the general had left the Army.

Still, the scourge of public censure must sting the pride of a man who cultivated a stainless public persona. “He’d always preached to his proteges that character was what you did when no one was watching,” wrote Vernon Loeb of The Washington Post.

Petraeus also preached about the significance of spirituality, according to Army Chaplain Col. Brent Causey, who spent 13 months with the general in Afghanistan. At least four in 10 service-members stationed there attended chapel, Causey said.

“It was a reflection of Gen. Petraeus and his leadership in placing importance on spirituality,” Causey told Baptist Press last year. “Gen. Petraeus focused on everyone’s spirituality, not just Christianity.”

Asked on Tuesday about Petraeus’ own faith, Causey, who now serves with the Army Corp of Engineers in Washington, said, “Sorry, I’m not allowed to talk about that,” and quickly hung up.

Breasseale, who worked with Petraeus, said he never heard the general express particular religious or political preferences.

Petraeus has never been beloved by anti-war liberals, though, especially those who see evangelical Christianity creeping over the military’s church-state wall.

The Military Religious Freedom Foundation chided the general for endorsing “Under Orders: A Spiritual Handbook for Military Personnel,” a book by former military chaplain William McCoy that the foundation says promotes Christianity and denigrates non-religious soldiers.

If Petraeus still harbors political aspirations, now might a good time for him to get religion and read that book, said the New Yorker’s Jon Lee Anderson. “If he licks his wounds and is seen praying humbly at his local church and does the right thing by his wife and family, America will probably forgive him,” Anderson wrote.

For what it’s worth, it seems like evangelical broadcaster Pat Robertson already has.

“The man’s off in a foreign land, he’s lonely and here’s a good-looking lady throwing herself at him,” Robertson said during a recent broadcast of the “The 700 Club.”

“I mean, he’s a man.”

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Religion News Service LLC.

  • ourfuture

    WaPo quoting the Bible?

    It could only be in the service of the WH, who most likely has used the FBI investigation of this affair to try to prevent Petraeus from testifying and/or influence what he said to Congress. Now that he has resigned, made the affair public, and essentially called their bluff, with the intention to testify, it is the MSM’s job to smear him so destructively that his credibility in the testimony will be seriously undermined.

    That’s my theory. I don’t recall WaPo quoting the Bible when Clinton cheated on his wife. Back then, it was not supposed to be an issue if powerful men had testosterone and therefore wanted to have extra marital sex. The only reason WaPo is now taking a holier-than-thou approach is because they want to make it all about sex for Petraeus, to distract us from the real scandal here, the four deaths at Benghazi, and to render his testimony worthless.

    It won’t work. Feinstein, Graham and the other Senators and Representatives on these oversight committees know that Petraeus’ testimony is central to getting to the bottom of the Benghazi scandal. They are serving our nation by investigating. WaPo would do well do serve the public in the same way, rather than turning into the National Enquirer in the service of the WH.

  • ourfuture

    Speaking of the Bible, I thought of another relevant reference….

    Petraeus is obviously a fallible human being (as demonstrated by having an affair as Director of the CIA), but he is a courageous career public servant, a master of strategy, and a man with a strong sense of duty to his country. Delilah may have cut Samson’s hair, but the Great Warrior may yet have a final chance to pull down the columns in the temple of the Philistines.

Read More Articles

SONY DSC
Dear Evangelicals, Please Reconsider Your Fight Against Gay Rights

A journalist and longtime observer of American religious culture offers some advice to his evangelical friends.

shutterstock_186090179
How Passover Makes the Impossible Possible

When we place ourselves within the story, we can imagine new realities.

This Passover, We’re Standing at an Unparted Red Sea

We need to ask ourselves: What will be the future of the State of Israel — and what will it require of us?

pews
Just As I Am

My childhood conversion to Christianity was only the first of many.

shutterstock_186364295
This God’s For You: Jesus and the Good News of Beer

How Jesus partied with a purpose.

egg.jpg
Jesus, Bunnies, and Colored Eggs: An Explanation of Holy Week and Easter

So, Easter is a one-day celebration of Jesus rising from the dead and turning into a bunny, right? Not exactly.

shutterstock_186566975
Hey Bart Ehrman, I’m Obsessed with Jesus, Too — But You’ve Got Him All Wrong

Why the debate over Jesus’ divinity matters.

shutterstock_127731035 (1)
Are Single People the Lepers of Today’s Church?

In an age of rising singlehood, many churches are still focused on being family ministry centers.

2337221655_c1671d2e5e_b
Mysterious Tremors

People like me who have mystical experiences may be encountering some unknown Other. What can we learn about what that Other is?

bible
Five Bible Verses You Need to Stop Misusing

That verse you keep quoting? It may not mean what you think it means.

csl_wall_paper
What C.S. Lewis’ Marriage Can Tell Us About the Gay Marriage Controversy

Why “welcome and wanted” is a biblical response to gay and lesbian couples in evangelical churches.

Antonio_Molinari_David_y_Abigail
How to Resolve Conflict: A Bible Lesson for Foreign Policy Leaders

The biblical story of Abigail shows how visible vulnerability can create a path toward peace.