Hopeful for

Getty Images Ccombination of file pictures shows Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney speaking during the American Legion 94th National Convention … Continued

Getty Images

Ccombination of file pictures shows Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney speaking during the American Legion 94th National Convention on Aug. 29, 2012 in Indianapolis and President Obama speaking during an event in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House campus on Aug. 3, 2012.

“There hasn’t been that much religious negativity during the general election,” someone commented to me recently. I think that’s generally been the case, and it’s a good thing as far as it goes. The anti-Mormon roar has quieted significantly, and there’s been barely any mainstream mention of the “Barack Obama is a Muslim” line.

Why might this be the case and what could it mean? Both President Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney are decent men, and my guess is they’ve made clear to their circles that they’re not going to stand for attacks on the religious identity of their opponent. I also think that there’s an interesting similarity in Obama and Romney’s spirituality – faith has played a significant role in inspiring them to serve others. Obama has relied on his Christianity from the time he converted as a community organizer on the south side of Chicago through his term as president. And even as he was closing high-level business deals, Romney was involved in an intense ministry to his fellow Mormons as a leader in the LDS church.

But I think we ought to have higher standards for discourse about faith in a general election than “it wasn’t ugly.” The fact is America is the most religiously diverse nation in the world and the most religiously devout nation in the west at a time of global religious conflict. How America engages its own religious diversity, and how it encourages interfaith cooperation for the rest of the world, matter a great deal right now.

View Photo Gallery: Moments when faith and politics intersect during the 2012 campaign.

Here are two things that I wish would have been a more explicitly discussed in the campaign, and that become themes in the administration of whoever wins the White House:

I had the honor of serving on President Obama’s inaugural faith council. I’ll never forget that first meeting in the Oval Office, where the president spoke of the importance of different faith communities – including secular humanists – joining with each other in service, highlighting that cooperation to the world, and inviting young people to both participate and lead such efforts. That guidance turned into, amongst other things, the president’s Interfaith and Community Service Campus Challenge, which my organization, Interfaith Youth Core, has run in partnership with the president’s Office of Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships. Over 400 campuses have participated in the first two years of the program. I see every reason to believe that a first-term President Romney or a second-term President Obama would continue such efforts. I sure hope so. At a time when too many people see religion as a barrier of division or a bomb of destruction, we need the leader of the free world helping make faith a bridge of cooperation.

Eboo Patel is founder and president of Interfaith Youth Core and author of the new book, “Sacred Ground.”

Written by

  • SursumCorda

    eboo patel thinks:

    “we need the leader of the free world helping make faith a bridge of cooperation”

    well – we shall see.. we shall see..

    but i seriouly doubt we will hear : )

    so.. rather than depending on words that are spoken – we should be watching as changes unfold..

    “I have long since come to believe that people never mean half of what they say, and that it is best to disregard their talk and judge only their actions.”

  • Kingofkings1

    I’m surprised many people still don’t get the idea that the framers intended for the United States to be truly a “new world” where the freedom to practice one’s religion is one of its core principles

  • TonyDiaz999

    The best way to religious freedom is to not talk about religion on official capacity and in governmental setting, only in an academic manner.

    Religion is naturally divisive.

    It is certainly not inter-faith alone, but between the faithful and the faithless.

  • aby2

    You are preaching to the choir. You need to direct your sermons to those in the world who are imposing their Sharia in the guise of a constitution on the non-Muslim citizens. Those non-Muslims are in most cases the indigenous population. If they object they are told they are free to leave the country. In short it is ” my way or the highway.”