Richard Mourdock’s ‘sick and twisted’ critics

Honestly, I don’t understand what all the fuss is about. In a Tuesday night debate, Richard Mourdock, the Indiana Republican … Continued

Honestly, I don’t understand what all the fuss is about.

In a Tuesday night debate, Richard Mourdock, the Indiana Republican running for the U.S. Senate made what turned out to be a controversial statement about abortion.

“I struggled with it myself for a long time,” he said, “but I came to realize that life is that gift from God. And I think even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen.”

Mourdock made the horrible mistake of telling the truth about what he believes. He actually believes that abortion is murder. And he actually believes that God creates life.

All hell has broken loose among his fellow Republicans. They are twisting themselves into pretzels trying to criticize him and support their Christian beliefs at the same time. Mitt Romney, who has a campaign ad out supporting Mourdock, has said that Mourdock’s remarks were not in line with his views. His Democratic opponent, Rep. Joe Donnelly, who supports abortion in cases of rape or incest, came down on him as did Sen. John McCain. Donnelly said, “The God I believe in and the God I know most Hoosiers believe in, does not intend for rape to happen, ever.  What Mr. Mourdock said is shocking and it is stunning that he would be so disrespectful of survivors of rape.” We’ve yet to hear from Rep. Paul Ryan whose positions on abortion are so convoluted nobody knows what he believes any more. 

Mourdock is still trying to explain what he meant, but the more he talks, the deeper he digs that hole.

“What I said was, in answering the question from my position of faith, I said I believe that God creates life.  I believe that as wholly and as fully as I can believe it, that God creates life. Are you trying to suggest that somehow I think that God pre-ordained rape? No, I don’t think that. That’s sick. Twisted. That’s not even close to what I said. What I said is that God creates life.”  

Here’s the problem: All of these guys are anti-abortion. They believe life begins at conception. Therefore, they believe an abortion is murder. So if that’s true, how can they possibly believe it is okay to murder a fetus (a fully realized person in their eyes) simply because of the way the child was conceived? This is baffling. I admire Mourdock for telling the truth about what he believes.  

What are these Republicans screaming about when their own party platform calls for a constitutional amendment banning abortion and doesn’t mention, rape, incest or the life of the mother?

I’ll tell you what they’re upset about.  They want the Republicans to win, they need the women’s vote and the country is not behind banning abortion in cases of rape or incest. In fact, the majority of voters is not against banning abortion at all. So the conscience of these convictions is based purely on politics.

Look at Ryan, changing his position from being against abortion in all cases to agreeing with Mitt Romney’s (new) position that it’s okay in the case of rape or incest. How can he live with himself?

Murder is murder. Would it be any different if they said they thought it was fine to kill a child after it had been born because it was conceived by rape or incest? What’s the age cutoff? If it is a human being from conception on, what is the difference?

Where Mourdock got himself into serious trouble was saying that rape is “something that God intended to happen.”

He’s right there, too, according to his beliefs. And, by the way, the beliefs of many of his Republican critics. If God creates life, then He must create rape as well.  God is all powerful.  The others are trying to cherry pick what they want God to have done. Does God, in their eyes, only do good? If that is true, how do we account for all the evil and suffering in the world? These are heavy questions but Mourdock was completely within reason to bring up the discussion, and he puts his opponents to shame by verbalizing what they do not dare.

His backtracking was a bit unfortunate.  He railed at those who suggested that he meant that  God “pre-ordained” rape and said that what he really meant was that God creates life.  I’d like to see the list of what God pre-ordains and what he doesn’t. How do we know?

Mourdock may be the pariah of the moment but the real culprits are those who believe one thing about life and death and who say another. To me that is what is “sick” and “twisted.”

About

Sally Quinn Sally Quinn is the founding editor of OnFaith.
  • sbirdy

    Everyone cherry-picks what they want God to have done. Everyone, including Mourdock. Including you.

    To say otherwise is thoroughly disingenuous. Your whole argument is out the window, as far as I’m concerned. Mourdock is just another man wanting to impose his will by calling it God’s will. And I’m sick of it and so are a lot of people.

    I’m voting for Obama and I hope the Republicans lose every election, right down the line. If Mourdock wants to push his interpretation of religion on someone, he should become a preacher and give up politics. This kind of backward, egocentric thinking is of no benefit to the ordinary citizen struggling to get by. Mourdock doesn’t live in the real world with the rest of us. He’s not suited to lead.

  • shawnb1975

    Isn’t it odd how “God’s Will” usually aligns with their own desires…

  • dollaes4dullards

    It’s God’s will that God’s will align with the will of his believers. And apparently God’s will that God’s will not align with my will. Unless I exercise my free will to align myself with God’s will. In which case I, of my own free will, will leave will out of it altogether.

    Will God.

    And sadly, that makes more sense than all the convoluted attempts to make God responsible for the conception but not the act that produced it.

Read More Articles

colbert
Top 10 Reasons We’re Glad A Catholic Colbert Is Taking Over Letterman’s “Late Show”

How might we love Stephen Colbert as the “Late Show” host? Let us count the ways.

emptytomb
God’s Not Dead? Why the Good News Is Better than That

The resurrection of Jesus is not a matter of private faith — it’s a proclamation for the whole world.

noplaceonearth
An Untold Story of Bondage to Freedom: Passover 1943

How a foxhole that led to a 77-mile cave system saved the lives of 38 Ukrainian Jews during the Holocaust.

shutterstock_148333673
Friend or Foe? Learning from Judas About Friendship with Jesus

We call Judas a betrayer. Jesus called him “friend.”

shutterstock_53190298
Fundamentalist Arguments Against Fundamentalism

The all-or-nothing approach to the Bible used by skeptics and fundamentalists alike is flawed.

shutterstock_178468880
Mary Magdalene, the Closest Friend of Jesus

She’s been ignored, dismissed, and misunderstood. But the story of Easter makes it clear that Mary was Jesus’ most faithful friend.

shutterstock_186795503
The Three Most Surprising Things Jesus Said

Think you know Jesus? Some of his sayings may surprise you.

shutterstock_185995553
How to Debate Christians: Five Ways to Behave and Ten Questions to Answer

Advice for atheists taking on Christian critics.

HIFR
Heaven Hits the Big Screen

How “Heaven is for Real” went from being an unsellable idea to a bestselling book and the inspiration for a Hollywood movie.

shutterstock_186364295
This God’s For You: Jesus and the Good News of Beer

How Jesus partied with a purpose.

egg.jpg
Jesus, Bunnies, and Colored Eggs: An Explanation of Holy Week and Easter

So, Easter is a one-day celebration of Jesus rising from the dead and turning into a bunny, right? Not exactly.

SONY DSC
Dear Evangelicals, Please Reconsider Your Fight Against Gay Rights

A journalist and longtime observer of American religious culture offers some advice to his evangelical friends.