Majority of Protestant pastors back Romney, but many still undecided

A majority of Protestant pastors plan to vote for GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney, according to a new survey, but … Continued

A majority of Protestant pastors plan to vote for GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney, according to a new survey, but nearly a quarter are still undecided less than a month from Election Day.

Just 17 percent of Protestant pastors said they would vote to re-elect President Obama, with 57 percent favoring Romney and 22 percent undecided, according to a survey conducted by LifeWay Research.

Based in Nashville, Tenn., the research firm is a branch of LifeWay Christian Resources.

The results are remarkably similar to a LifeWay survey conducted in October 2008, which found that 55 percent of Protestant pastors planned to vote for then-GOP nominee John McCain, 20 percent for Obama and 22 percent were undecided.

Among the Protestant pastors who will not vote for Romney, just 15 percent said his Mormonism factored in their decision. Six in 10 undecided pastors said their hesitation is not related to Romney’s membership in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

A LifeWay survey conducted in 2011 found that 75 percent of Protestant pastors do not consider Mormons Christians.

“If agreement on matters of faith was a necessity for pastors’ voting decisions, Romney would have little support from pastors,” said Scott McConnell, director of LifeWay Research. “In fact, Romney’s Mormon faith has led very few pastors to select a different candidate or remain undecided.”

Party preference played a strong role in determining pastors’ political choices, the survey found. More than 80 percent of Republican pastors plan to vote for Romney, and a nearly identical number of Democratic pastors plan to vote for Obama. Independents break toward Romney (47 to 16 percent).

The survey found significant differences between mainline Protestant and evangelical pastors. Two-thirds of self-identified evangelical pastors plan to vote for Romney, with just 9 percent backing Obama. Among mainline Protestants, 54 percent say they will vote for Romney, 28 percent for Obama and 25 percent are undecided.

Regional and generational differences also played a role in voting preferences. Pastors in the Northeast (28 percent) are more likely to vote for Obama than Southern (14 percent) and Western (15 percent) pastors.

Younger pastors, meanwhile, are far less likely than their elders to vote for Obama. Just 14 percent of pastors age 18-44 say they will vote for the incumbent. They are also more likely to be undecided than pastors 55 and older.

Donovan Golden, the community pastor at Metro Church in Rogers, Ark., is among the young evangelicals who will not vote for either candidate. The 27-year-old Liberty University graduate said Obama’s liberal policies and Romney’s religion both give him pause.

“Our values are based on our theology,” said Golden, who has studied the distinctions between Mormonism and mainstream Christianity. “So our leaders’ theological stances are vitally important. Our theology shapes our values — not vice versa.”

This election, Golden said he is taking his cue from Charles Spurgeon, a 19th-century British Baptist preacher, who famously said “Of two evils, choose neither.”

The survey of Protestant pastors was conducted by phone Sept. 26-Oct. 3. Churches were selected randomly, and each interview was conducted with the church’s senior pastor, minister or priest, according to LifeWay. For the full sample of 1,000 pastors, the margin of error is plus or minus 3.2 percentage points.

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Religion News Service LLC.

  • Kent French


    Of course we are Christians.

    When people use the word cult and other disparaging words about someone else’s religion they are usually trying to insult someone else’s faith in an attempt to make themselves look and feel superior. Thus, it says more about them than anyone else. To all those who are guilty of this I would suggest that they switch to promoting their own religious belief system instead of trying to put down someone else’s. After all, that would be the Christian thing to do. On the other hand, since most of our detrators are uninformed, or have accepted as truth false teachings about my religion, I have to defend my faith. So, here goes.

    What most people do not realize is that there are two basic types of Christians, and most Christians fall into one category or the other. There are traditional Nicene Christians and Latter-day Christians (Mormons). Since both of these Christian groups believe that Jesus is the Christ, that he is God’s only begotten son, and since they strive to live their lives in accordance with the Savior’s commandments it follows that they are both Christians. What’s more, both of them believe they are saved by grace through their faith in Jesus Christ and his atoning sacrifice. So, what is that bottom line difference? Simply put, there is a difference in their belief systems as to the nature of God.

    Nicene Christians believe that God the Father, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Ghost are one and the same God, and that he (God) is a spirit without a body, parts or passions.

    On the other hand, Latter-day Christians teach that Jesus Christ is a separate person from his Heavenly Father, but united as one with him, and with the Holy Ghost, in mind, purpose, wisdom and power. They also believe that Jesus Christ is the God of the Old Testament who guided the ancient prophets, that he is still alive (resurrected), and that he now has an immortal, glorified, spiritual body of flesh and bones like his Heavenly Father’s in who’s image and likeness Adam’s mortal body was created. Furthermore, they believe that since his ascension into heaven he has taken his place once again at the right hand of his Heavenly Father.

    On a personal note, after pondering the Nicene doctrine concerning the nature of God, I have come to the conclusion that traditional Christians must believe Christ has returned to being a three in one spirit without a body, parts, and passions, and that he is no longer a resurrected personage. Is that true? Whether it is or not I would be very interested in gaining a better understanding of their doctrine on this particular matter.

Read More Articles

Top 10 Reasons We’re Glad A Catholic Colbert Is Taking Over Letterman’s “Late Show”

How might we love Stephen Colbert as the “Late Show” host? Let us count the ways.

God’s Not Dead? Why the Good News Is Better than That

The resurrection of Jesus is not a matter of private faith — it’s a proclamation for the whole world.

An Untold Story of Bondage to Freedom: Passover 1943

How a foxhole that led to a 77-mile cave system saved the lives of 38 Ukrainian Jews during the Holocaust.

Friend or Foe? Learning from Judas About Friendship with Jesus

We call Judas a betrayer. Jesus called him “friend.”

Fundamentalist Arguments Against Fundamentalism

The all-or-nothing approach to the Bible used by skeptics and fundamentalists alike is flawed.

Mary Magdalene, the Closest Friend of Jesus

She’s been ignored, dismissed, and misunderstood. But the story of Easter makes it clear that Mary was Jesus’ most faithful friend.

The Three Most Surprising Things Jesus Said

Think you know Jesus? Some of his sayings may surprise you.

How to Debate Christians: Five Ways to Behave and Ten Questions to Answer

Advice for atheists taking on Christian critics.

Heaven Hits the Big Screen

How “Heaven is for Real” went from being an unsellable idea to a bestselling book and the inspiration for a Hollywood movie.

This God’s For You: Jesus and the Good News of Beer

How Jesus partied with a purpose.

Jesus, Bunnies, and Colored Eggs: An Explanation of Holy Week and Easter

So, Easter is a one-day celebration of Jesus rising from the dead and turning into a bunny, right? Not exactly.

Dear Evangelicals, Please Reconsider Your Fight Against Gay Rights

A journalist and longtime observer of American religious culture offers some advice to his evangelical friends.