Obama at the U.N.: A new religion doctrine

WASHINGTON — President Obama on Tuesday (Sept. 25) gave a forceful speech at the United Nations, in which he challenged … Continued

WASHINGTON — President Obama on Tuesday (Sept. 25) gave a forceful speech at the United Nations, in which he challenged much of the world’s assumptions about free speech and religion.

Here are five points from his address, which together, add up to as close to an Obama Doctrine on Religion as we’ve seen:

1. Blasphemy must be tolerated, however intolerable

The idea that the U.S. protects even vile speech, so ingrained in American culture, seems counterintuitive to much of the world. It’s an especially tough concept when speech targets a religion, but Obama argued that restrictions on speech too often become weapons to suppress religion — especially the rights of religious minorities.

“Given the power of faith in our lives, and the passions that religious differences can inflame, the strongest weapon against hateful speech is not repression, it is more speech,” Obama said.

Moreover, he continued, no one can control speech even if he or she wanted to.

“When anyone with a cell phone can spread offensive views around the world with the click of a button, the notion that we can control the flow of information is obsolete,” Obama said.

2. Religious respect is a two-way street

Obama went on the offensive: If you’re going to denounce intolerance against your own religion, he said, you must also call out those who demean the religion of others.

“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam,” the president said. “Yet to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated, churches are destroyed, or the Holocaust is denied.”

3. Turn the other cheek

In the wake of riots across the Muslim world sparked by the anti-Muslim film “The Innocence of Muslims,” Obama called violence an illegitimate reaction to offensive speech, religious or otherwise.

“There are no words that excuse the killing of innocents. There is no video that justifies an attack on an embassy. There is no slander that provides an excuse for people to burn a restaurant in Lebanon, or destroy a school in Tunis, or cause death and destruction in Pakistan.”

4. One nation under God

Obama drew on the religious diversity of the U.S. to make his case for tolerance abroad.

“We are a country that has welcomed people of every race and religion. We are home to Muslims who worship across our country,” he said. “We understand why people take offense to this video because millions of our citizens are among them.”

Religion scholar Diana Butler Bass said the president went further, presenting a modern vision of American exceptionalism from which the rest of the world can learn, “where the U.S. is uniquely positioned to offer a vision of pluralism.”

“It’s a compelling explanation of what America can be in a diverse and connected world,” she said.

5. The danger of extremism

The democratic movements sweeping the Arab world could be derailed by intolerance rooted in religious difference, Obama warned. He made the preservation of the Arab Spring a global responsibility.

“It is time to marginalize those who — even when not resorting to violence — use hatred of America, or the West, or Israel as a central principle of politics,” he said. “For that only gives cover, and sometimes makes excuses, for those who resort to violence.”

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Religion News Service LLC.

  • LoudounPatriot

    When Americans are faced with religious hate speech, it is roundly condemned.

  • circadia

    “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” #ObamaFail

    How is it even possible to slander someone who’s very reputation as a “prophet” is a matter of belief? I’ll speak badly of Islam and it’s prophet or any religion and it’s prophet whenever I want. And in doing so, the future will belong as much to me as it does to anyone who fervently believes in Islam or any other religion. I have as much right to mock religion as believers have to practice religion. As long as they don’t harm me for mocking and I don’t harm them for practicing, we’re good.

  • Kafantaris

    The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution itself are both utopian, and both over 200 years old. But unlike other utopias, the one our forefathers embraced works.

    It has an ingenious mechanism to revitalize its institutions: Freedom of speech.

    As John Stuart Mill explained, when a society allows its citizens to question its government, its values and its most sacred beliefs, the examination finds errors and things for improvement.

    But even when no correction at all is needed, the challenge in itself works miracles — it forces us to defend them.

    If things prove fine after such “stress test,” we learn that we are on the right track. Merely knowing this wipes away uncertainty and replaces it with life and vigor.

    Such is the hidden benefit of open debate — and the reason why institutions elsewhere stagnate and die.

    And no one rushes to save them because people have forgotten long before why they are there in the first place. This is the grave danger John Mill warned us about.

    The fathers of this country gave heed to his words.

    Perhaps the fathers of new democracies should do the same.