Missouri remains land of religious promise for Mormons

INDEPENDENCE, Mo. — In 1831, Mormon founder Joseph Smith declared that the righteous would gather in Independence, Mo., to greet … Continued

INDEPENDENCE, Mo. — In 1831, Mormon founder Joseph Smith declared that the righteous would gather in Independence, Mo., to greet the Second Coming of Jesus Christ — just one of the prophecies that estranged his faith from traditional Christianity.

Thousands of converted Mormons moved from Ohio and upstate New York to claim their New Jerusalem. Disputes with Missourians led to a bloody Mormon War that ended only when the state’s governor issued an “extermination order” to expel Smith’s followers.

Today, few places are better to contemplate the evolving — but still uncertain — relationship between Mormonism and the country where it was founded.

On the one hand, Missouri symbolizes how far Mormons have come. At least 66,000 Mormons now live in the state, more than triple the number of just three decades ago. Most recently, the LDS church has built a temple in Kansas City, Mo., near the epicenter of the Mormon War.

But Missouri also serves to highlight the intractable differences between mainstream Christianity and Mormon theology.

Independence and other nearby sites in western Missouri — including a pasture 70 miles north that Smith tied to the Garden of Eden — serve to emphasize distinctive Mormon beliefs. Those differences are amplified by Mormon scriptures, doctrines and the abandoned practice of polygamy.

A poll by the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life found that half of non-Mormons do not consider Mormons Christian and when asked to describe the faith in one word, the most common response was “cult.”

That tension of a faith still on the edges of acceptance and yet growing in popularity has surfaced with the nomination of Mitt Romney as the Republican candidate for president. It has been highlighted further by the popularity of the Broadway musical “The Book of Mormon,” which pokes fun at elements of the faith.

All the attention has added up to what has been dubbed the “Mormon moment.” And many Mormons have greeted it with a measure of ambivalence. A January Pew poll reinforces that anxiety, with two-thirds of Mormons saying they don’t believe they are accepted as part of mainstream society.

“I think some people have a sense of anxiety, and maybe a little hesitancy to speak up and share right now,” said Ben Munson, a Lake Saint Louis resident who serves on the church’s regional public affairs council. “But there are others who look at this moment as a huge opportunity to share the gospel with a co-worker or a friend.”

Smith sought not merely to reform Christianity, but to rebuild the early Christian church, with new apostles and priesthood authority. He claimed not only to have seen God and Jesus in a vision as a young boy, but also to have been given gold plates from an angel, from which he published the Book of Mormon.

A year after completing the Book of Mormon, Smith said God had told him a “New Jerusalem, a land of peace, a city of refuge, a place of safety for the saints” would be built in Jackson County, Mo.

“And the glory of the Lord shall be there, and the terror of the Lord also shall be there,” Smith’s revelation continued, “insomuch that the wicked will not come unto it, and it shall be called Zion.”

The revelations declared that a temple would be built on a lot in Independence, 10 miles east of Kansas City, and would be the site of a gathering for the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.

The boldness of those claims invited conflict with Missouri settlers. Mormons who settled in Jackson County were soon pushed out. And when a plan to relocate Mormons to newly formed Caldwell County also ended in conflict, Gov. Lilburn Boggs ordered all Mormons out — leaving their sacred sites behind.

Since then, the vividness of Smith’s prophecy about a gathering and temple in Independence has faded.

“Today neither Missouri nor the temple lot there figure prominently in the consciousness of the average Mormon,” said Terryl Givens, a Mormon and professor of religion and literature at the University of Richmond in Virginia. “Most Mormons probably don’t even know the particulars of Smith’s teachings on the subject.”

Modern Mormonism should be defined not by unusual Missouri prophecies, Givens said, but by core doctrines. And many Mormons focus on what’s common between their faith and mainstream Christianity. They worship Jesus Christ, and take weekly sacraments in his name. They host potluck dinners and youth socials.

“Outsiders’ fantasies of what Mormons do in worship services are much more exciting than the truth,” said Laurie Maffly-Kipp, a non-Mormon scholar of the faith and chairwoman of the University of North Carolina’s religion department. “When I send my students to a sacrament service, they usually come back talking about how boring it was.”

But that’s not to say that prophecies about Missouri and the historic sites tied to them have been stripped of spiritual significance.

On a recent afternoon, financial planner Tom Springer, 39, and his wife, Olivia Hood, 34, a piano teacher, both from Fort Worth, Texas, stopped for a picnic at Far West, Mo. — a site Smith had designated for a temple.

The couple were crossing the country to visit family, and they stopped at a few Mormon sites to teach their children about the history of their church and to connect with the suffering and fortitude of that first generation of saints.

The couple said that while they believe in the prophecies of their faith — including a gathering of Mormons in Missouri during the last days — some of those teachings don’t fit in their daily lives.

“We believe those revelations from the prophet as central to the restored church, and we take them extremely seriously,” Springer said.

“When God tells me to move my family to Independence, I’ll move them,” Hood said. “But right now, we like Fort Worth. We’re not going to put our house on the market just yet.”

The plot of land in Independence that Smith said would be the site of Zion’s great temple is a vacant lot, owned and safeguarded by a tiny LDS offshoot. But various sects with ties to Mormonism still revere the land’s significance.

The 250,000-member Community of Christ, for example, has built a glistening conch-shaped temple across the street from Smith’s designated temple site.

The larger LDS church maintains its visitor center across the street, where missionaries conduct tours and show movies that tell the story of the early Mormon pioneers.

For Jeremiah Morgan the call to Zion’s soil is tilled deep into his genealogy. Morgan’s ancestors were Joseph Smith’s neighbors in Nauvoo, Ill., where Mormons congregated after their expulsion from Missouri. Smith was killed there, and soon after that, Brigham Young led the saints to Utah. But Morgan’s relatives remained in the Midwest and joined a reorganized LDS group that had rejected Young’s leadership.

When Morgan was a child, his mother moved her family to Independence to prepare for the gathering at Zion.

Morgan, 41, has since joined the larger LDS church and is now a stake president, one of the highest church officers in the Kansas City region.

If the early saints viewed western Missouri as a final gathering place, modern Mormons tend to think of Zion more metaphorically, as a state of spiritual being. Today’s saints are more focused on constancy, on sticking around suburban subdivisions across the nation and driving minivans packed with children to small congregations.

“The prophet said to make Zion wherever you are,” Morgan said. “Zion is people.”

And this May, Mormons in the Kansas City region, who now number nearly 30,000, gathered to dedicate a gleaming white, double-spired temple. It was built not on the sacred plots designated by Smith, but off an interstate, just three miles west of a jail that once held Smith for four months.

Speeches during the dedication service made reference to western Missouri’s unhappy place in church history, but also emphasized healing rather than pain.

The temple, Morgan said, represents “how far we’ve come as a people and as a nation.”

(Tim Townsend writes for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch in St. Louis.)

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Religion News Service LLC.

  • coltakashi93

    As you noted, there are already ten times as many Mormons in the Kansas City metro area as there were in the 1830s, when slave holding Missourians were histile to Mormons from New York and Ohio who did not suppirt slavery. Mormon prophecies say that Christ will come again in his full glory as Jehovah, and establish two world capitals, one in Jerusalem and the other in Independence, near the center of North America. If millions of Jews and Christians can look forward to Jerusalem becoming a center of peace and holiness after thousands if years of armed struggle, how much more difficult could it be for Christ to establish a second capital in the New World? The Mormon beliefs are a test to see how seriously anyone takes the prophecies if the coming of Messiah = Christ to set the world right and end evil and injustice. Unlike some Protestants who think thry will leave this earth behind, Mormons believe this earth will continue to be our home. In the meantime, the plan Joseph Smith created fir the city he hoprd to build was adapted and implemented in the layout of Salt Lake, with a rectangular grid centered on Temple Square.

  • Moracle

    What kind of person would judge a religion by where they believe the Garden of Eden was, or where Adam lived after expusion from thence?

    It seems about as senseless as judging them by which way they believe the Pearly Gates of Heaven swing!

    The vital elements in judging a religion should be:

    (1) What do they teach as being necessary to gain salvation, and return to the presence of their Father in Heaven, to whom Jesus prayed, and how does it agree with the teachngs of Jesus?

    (2) Do the pastors, rectors, bishops, etc. claim to have authority from God to perform their priestly functions (baptisms, etc.), and can they trace it back to Jesus Christ, or did they just get it from graduating from some religious institution?

    It seems to me that these are the truly important issues by which a religion should be judged.

  • Kent French

    When people use disparaging words and try to mock someone else’s religion they are purposely trying to insult someone else’s faith in an attempt to make themselves look and feel superior. Thus, it says more about them than anyone else. To all those who are guilty of this I would suggest that they switch to talking about their own religious belief system instead of someone else’s. On the other hand, since people are slamming my religion I have to defend my faith. So, here goes.

    What most people do not realize is that there are two types of Christians. There are traditional Nicene Christians and Latter-day Christians (Mormons). Since both of these Christian groups believe that Jesus is the Christ, that he is God’s only begotten son, and since they strive to live their lives in accordance with the Savior’s commandments it follows that they are both Christians. What’s more, both of them believe they are saved by grace through their faith in Jesus Christ and his atoning sacrifice.

    So, when you really get to the bottom of things what is that bottom line difference? Simply put, there is a difference in their belief systems as to the nature of God. Nicene Christians believe that God the Father, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Ghost are one and the same God, and that he (God) is a spirit without a body, parts or passions. On the other hand, Latter-day Christians teach that Jesus Christ is a separate person from his Heavenly Father, but united as one with him, and with the Holy Ghost, in mind, purpose, wisdom and power. They also believe that Jesus Christ is the God of the Old Testament who guided the ancient prophets, that he is still alive (resurrected), and that he now has an immortal, glorified, spiritual body of flesh and bones like his Heavenly Father’s in who’s image and likeness Adam’s mortal body was created. Furthermore, they believe that since his ascension into heaven he has taken his place once again at the right hand of his Heavenly Father.

    On a personal note, after pondering the Nicene doctrine concerning the nature of God, I have come to the conclusion that traditional Christians must believe Christ has returned to being a three in one spirit without a body, parts, and passions, and that he is no longer a resurrected personage. Is that true? Whether it is or not I would be very interested in gaining a better understanding of their doctrine on this particular matter.