Sept. 11 awakened us to a ‘battle for the soul of Islam’

REUTERS The Tribute in Light illuminates the sky over Lower Manhattan in remembrance of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on … Continued


The Tribute in Light illuminates the sky over Lower Manhattan in remembrance of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on the 11-year anniversary in New York Sept. 11, 2012.

For Americans, the iconic face of terrorism has become the devastation of the Twin Towers. For many American Muslims the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 were an awakening to the urgency of the long festering struggles deep within our faith communities. Radicalism does not spontaneously arise out of thin air. Al-Qaeda, Hamas, the Taliban, or Hezbollah are but symptoms of a far more pervasive ideology that has both violent and non-violent components. “Violent extremism”, as some like to call it, is only one terminal end point of an insidious ideology that provides a conveyer belt with many other endpoints. Liberal Muslims know that none end in genuine liberty, and all end in some form of theocratic supremacy.

Enjoying a deep love of God and the role which Islam plays in my own soul and conscience, I have long known this central conflict to be a deeper more nuanced one between political Islam (Islamism) and liberty (liberal democracy). Many of us had already long begun to confront the deep seeded elements within various Muslim mindsets and institutions of political Islam (Islamism) and its incompatibilities with modernity and American freedom.

View Photo Gallery: The nation gathers Tuesday to mark the 11th anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

But Sept. 11 shook me and many of us to the core, out of our old complacency to defer change to future generations. It catapulted me into the realization that we had a unique responsibility or calling both as Americans and as Muslims to lead that change now.

The U.S. gives us a unique laboratory to engage in the debates within Islam that only we as Muslims can wage. And we should not squander that opportunity. After all, American Muslims are uniquely positioned to counter Islamism globally and thus turn the tide against radicalism. In fact, devout, God-fearing Muslims are the only ones with the credibility and the inherent self-interest in the faith legacy we leave our children and country necessary to effectively take on the root cause of Islamist inspired terrorism.

In the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks we established the American Islamic Forum for Democracy with a mission of lifting up the ideas of liberty within the Muslim consciousness and identity.

We have an obligation to the families that lost loved ones in the Sept. 11 attacks to speak truth to power. While many Muslims living comfortably in the U.S. may have reformed and brought our personal practice in line with modernity, the theological power structures in our faith community are generally still far from needed reform and critique against Islamism and its progeny.

The obstacles to this work have been too numerous to count. We have sadly since found our nation for the most part generally unwilling to engage with Muslims in a “tough love” toward open reform.

In a post-Sept. 11 world predominant beltway politicians and news media who only see the world through partisan polarity have simply reserved discussion of Muslims to a convenient minority checkbox that is invoked when politically expedient. Both sides have been complicit at times. One using Muslims to falsely paint the other as “bigots”, and the other using Muslims to highlight their mastery of national security. Both are losing site of the core problems and solutions that the attacks highlighted for us.

Meanwhile, many Muslim groups claiming to speak for Muslims in America, most notably the Muslim Brotherhood legacy groups (CAIR, ISNA, MPAC, or MAS, i.e.) derive their fuel from those very forces that insist upon looking at us Muslims as one collective. That has given them all the room they need to deny reformists ideological diversity, to deny the need for reform, and to deny the link of Islamism to radicalization. These groups have thrived in the victimization mantra, fear mongering, and pigeon-holing of Muslims in order to circle the wagons, stifle debate, and perpetuate denial within.

The strategy of Islamist groups in America has only stoked the flames. Deference to political correctness has also suppressed debate.

In the end, there can be no better way to ebb the tide of fear of Muslims in the West than for Muslims to demonstrate that we are the most important asset in defeating the very ideologies that attacked us 11 years ago. This requires an embrace of a public critique of our faith leaders and institutions. All other approaches have been proven failures. The deep seeded reform needed against the idea of the “Islamic state”, the political ummah and its inherent public instruments of shariah (not the personal pietistic shariah but that in government) will do more to normalize relations with Muslims than any other strategy .

The massacre at Fort Hood on Nov. 5, 2009 steeled my resolve more than ever that we needed to trace back and publicly dissect every component of the separatist ideas that drove Maj. Nidal Hasan to hate his nation and commit his act of terror and kill 13 of our fellow soldiers. We can no longer compartmentalize domestic threats from foreign ones. We need a
Liberty Doctrine
in our approach to Muslims.

The central problem remains the same whether it’s Sept. 11 or Hasan or “Green on Blue” attacks in Afghanistan. Until American Muslims can lead the long overdue journey away from Islamism and towards modernity and actually begin to wage A Battle for the Soul of Islam through the separation of mosque and state, the threats we all face at home and abroad will only grow.

M. Zuhdi Jasser is the author of the recently released book, “A Battle for the Soul of Islam” and is president and founder of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy based in Phoenix. He is also a commissioner on the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom (opinions posted here are his own).

  • Senavifan

    I can see some hope in Jassers attitude and plans. The “victimization” groups like CAIR are in fact part of the problem.

    US attitudes about Islam are clearly changing toward the negative. Muslims should remember that our constitution is not immutable.

    American at some point will not tolerate Islamist supremicism.

  • understandingislam

    Jasser mentions an “insidious ideology”, “Islamism”, “political Islam”, but he does not even hint at the source of this ideology. Anyone who is even a little bit familiar with Islam knows that this “insidious ideology” comes from the very same place that the rest of Islam comes from, namely, the Koran. It is part and parcel of the Koran, and the Koran is indivisible. The “insidious ideology” is only the practical application of the Islamic principles and laws set forth in the Koran and the sayings of Muhammad. This ideology is certainly insidious, and it cannot ever be separated from the rest of Islam. It is all one package. Jasser needs to discuss this, but he never does.

    Jasser writes: “In the end, there can be no better way to ebb the tide of fear of Muslims in the West than for Muslims to demonstrate that we are the most important asset in defeating the very ideologies that attacked us 11 years ago. This requires an embrace of a public critique of our faith leaders and institutions.” Of course, there is no sign that this is happening or will happen. Jasser flatters himself to believe that “Muslims are the most important asset in defeating the very ideologies that attacked us 11 years ago.” In fact, they are not an asset al all. They never critique their faith leaders and institutions, except very sujperficially because those faith leaders and institutions base themselves on the Koran, and moderate Moslems do not criticize the Koran. Not even a little bit. There is no battle going on for the soul of Islam. There is scarcely even a skirmish.

  • understandingislam

    I see no hope at all in Jasser’s attitude. He has been ostracized from the Muslim community; and, therefore, he exerts no influence on it. If ”
    US attitudes about Islam are clearly changing toward the negative,” that that is great news. It is hight time!

  • Abigail11

    Is there a copy-editor in the house? Zuhdi Jasser is an eloquent and intelligent man. Who at the WaPo mutilated his writings to create sentence fragments and mistake “sight” with “site”? If you can’t get this kind of thing right, how can we expect the paper to respect and conform to its own legacy of great, accurate journalism?

  • Kingofkings1

    While I thought the title of this article was something worth reading, I quickly realized that proper justice could not be done to this important topic by those who have squandered our goodwill and sold their souls for transient gains: Juhdi Jasser, Irshad Manji, Wafa Sultan, Salman Rushdie, and others that are not worth mentioning.

    I hope there is no shortage of sincere indivduals who can shed light on this important topic

  • shadocat

    I was beginning to give up on Muslims. Thanks for this article, it restores my hope for a sane world.

Read More Articles

Dear Evangelicals, Please Reconsider Your Fight Against Gay Rights

A journalist and longtime observer of American religious culture offers some advice to his evangelical friends.

How Passover Makes the Impossible Possible

When we place ourselves within the story, we can imagine new realities.

This Passover, We’re Standing at an Unparted Red Sea

We need to ask ourselves: What will be the future of the State of Israel — and what will it require of us?

Just As I Am

My childhood conversion to Christianity was only the first of many.

This God’s For You: Jesus and the Good News of Beer

How Jesus partied with a purpose.

Jesus, Bunnies, and Colored Eggs: An Explanation of Holy Week and Easter

So, Easter is a one-day celebration of Jesus rising from the dead and turning into a bunny, right? Not exactly.

Hey Bart Ehrman, I’m Obsessed with Jesus, Too — But You’ve Got Him All Wrong

Why the debate over Jesus’ divinity matters.

shutterstock_127731035 (1)
Are Single People the Lepers of Today’s Church?

In an age of rising singlehood, many churches are still focused on being family ministry centers.

Mysterious Tremors

People like me who have mystical experiences may be encountering some unknown Other. What can we learn about what that Other is?

Five Bible Verses You Need to Stop Misusing

That verse you keep quoting? It may not mean what you think it means.

What C.S. Lewis’ Marriage Can Tell Us About the Gay Marriage Controversy

Why “welcome and wanted” is a biblical response to gay and lesbian couples in evangelical churches.

How to Resolve Conflict: A Bible Lesson for Foreign Policy Leaders

The biblical story of Abigail shows how visible vulnerability can create a path toward peace.