Missouri prayer amendment passes by wide margin

COLUMBIA, Mo. — Voters in Missouri overwhelmingly approved a “right to pray” amendment to the state’s constitution on Tuesday (Aug. … Continued

COLUMBIA, Mo. — Voters in Missouri overwhelmingly approved a “right to pray” amendment to the state’s constitution on Tuesday (Aug. 7), despite concerns about the measure’s necessity and legality.

Amendment 2, which supporters said would protect the freedom of religious expression in public schools and other public spaces, received nearly 80 percent of the vote.

The language on Tuesday’s ballot stressed the rights of citizens to express their religious beliefs and the rights of children to pray and acknowledge God in schools. It also stated that students could be exempted from classroom activities that violate their religious beliefs.

State Rep. Mike McGhee, a Republican who sponsored the amendment, said it would remind people about their religious freedoms, such as reading religious books at school. “It’s OK to bring your Bible to study hall,” he said.

It is not clear how students’ exemption from classroom activities will be regulated. McGhee has said it could vary by age group, but individual school districts will likely create their own policies on the matter.

The amendment was backed by Missouri’s four Catholic bishops and the Missouri Baptist Convention. The Episcopal Diocese of Missouri and several non-Christian groups opposed it. Legal experts almost unanimously predict that the amendment will wind up in court.

Critics also argued the amendment is redundant — the U.S. Constitution already protects religious freedom. And some warned that it would spark countless lawsuits and bring unintended consequences.

“It opens up a can of worms most people don’t want to open,” said Greg Grenke, a 22-year-old voter from Columbia who voted against the amendment. He said he’s not against prayer — he just doesn’t think the amendment was necessary.

Pediatrician Ellen Thomas, 48, said the amendment seemed like propaganda.

“I really just think it’s designed to stir up angry sentiment.” She added, “There’s no infringement on people’s right to pray as it is.”

Kathy Rowland, 55, of Columbia, Mo., said the amendment seemed “well-intentioned,” but unnecessary.

Still, the amendment garnered enough support to pass by a 7-1 margin.

“I was glad to see it,” said Margie Cravens, 87, as she left her Columbia polling place. “And we need prayer now more than ever before.”

Missouri Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill voted “yes” on the amendment.

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Religion News Service LLC.

  • gladerunner

    The real test of the suspicious motives behind this curious, perhaps specious amendment is when it is exercised/invoked by other-than-Christian individuals and groups. When little Assad, Ravi, Xio and Noriko take exception to lessons and course material.

  • UnHueMan

    another waste of time and tax payer dollars for this will surely be overturned in court. Sure glad those conservative states continue to tackle the important issues, while continuing to ignore jobs and the economy in this country.

  • Hanna4055

    I would say a high percentage of Missouri voters had no clue as to what they were actually voting for. The language on the ballot did not include the guts of the amendment. If it did, the vote would have had a different outcome. All I can say, is that I’m glad my children are grown and my grandchildren live in another state. Sad day for Missouri.