Bishops ‘dubious’ on White House contraception compromise

The nation’s Catholic bishops have again voiced doubts about the Obama administration’s plans to modify a mandate for employers to … Continued

The nation’s Catholic bishops have again voiced doubts about the Obama administration’s plans to modify a mandate for employers to provide free birth control coverage, vowing to press a new campaign to rally Americans to defend religious freedom.

Despite their skepticism, a statement issued Wednesday (March 14) by leading bishops at the end of a closed-door meeting in Washington was notable for lacking the “war on religion” rhetoric that has characterized many of the hierarchy’s broadsides against the White House.

While the bishops called the proposal unveiled by President Obama on Feb. 10 “an unspecified and dubious future ‘accommodation,’” they also stressed that they are willing to “accept any invitation to dialogue” with the White House.

The Rev. Thomas Reese, a Jesuit at Georgetown University who follows the inner workings of the hierarchy, described the language as “strong and uncompromising” but not “inflammatory.”

“There is no talk of the Obama administration waging a war on religion or being anti-Catholic,” Reese said. “There is no talk of civil disobedience or canceling health insurance for their employees if they do not get their way.”

The White House is currently in talks with an array of religious leaders — many of them Catholic officials from hospitals, universities and social service agencies — on how to structure an acceptable compromise.

The linchpin of Obama’s accommodation is to have insurance companies, rather than religious employers, cover the costs of contraception coverage in separate deals with employees that do not involve faith-based organizations.

Staffers from the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops who were involved in initial talks ended negotiations because they felt the administration was not dealing fairly with them, a charge the administration rejects.

Tensions over the contraception mandate have escalated divisions between the administration and the Catholic bishops, and led to speculation that the two-day meeting of the USCCB’s Administrative Committee would look for ways to soften the tone.

Wednesday’s statement from 40 or so leading bishops seemed to stay the course while perhaps dialing down the rhetoric a notch.

It also said that apart from trying to restart talks with the White House, the bishops would seek relief through Congress and the courts. Both of those avenues pose significant hurdles, especially since public opinion is not coalescing behind either the bishops’ stand or their attempts to frame the battle as a fight to defend religious liberty.

That may explain why the Administrative Committee statement also highlighted an upcoming new campaign, to be launched with the publication of “A Statement on Religious Liberty,” which will reportedly broaden the scope to include limitations on churches aiding illegal immigrants, Christian groups organizing on campuses, and churches renting space in public schools.

Another clear goal of the Administrative Committee was to project a united front in the church’s campaign against the contraception rule. The bishops have openly criticized other church agencies and publications for praising the White House accommodation and for critiquing the hierarchy’s rationale for its ongoing opposition.

Wednesday’s statement said the bishops are “strongly unified and intensely focused,” and they thank “all who have stood firmly with us in our vigorous opposition to this unjust and illegal mandate.”

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Universal Uclick.

  • nyvoter70

    What we should also be hearing about is that everyone whose health insurance policies cover elective abortion will be paying a separate $1 fee to cover them, which is just an accounting trick to get around the Hyde amendment. Google “affordable care act” and “section 1303″ which will take you to the White House page about it.

    It also says that insurance companies aren’t allowed to tell people about this except at enrollment. It will most likely be in the fine print.

  • gerrard_ts

    The First Amendment is on the side of the Catholic bishops on this issue.

    It’s time for the Obama adminstration to quit pretending their ‘compromise’ is in any way satisfactory and quit pretending they are doing Catholics any favors and for Ms. Sebelius to finally propose rules that actually respect the First Amendment.

  • BagaMcguirk

    In what way does allowing insurance companies to directly give birth control to women violate the first amendment right?