Court says student’s faith may have led to expulsion

A counseling student who declined to advise a gay client might have been expelled from her university because of her … Continued

A counseling student who declined to advise a gay client might have been expelled from her university because of her faith, a federal appeals court ruled on Friday (Jan. 27).

Citing her evangelical Christian religion, Julea Ward disagreed with professors at Eastern Michigan University who told her she was required to support the sexual orientation of her clients. When the graduate student was assigned a client who sought counseling on a same-sex relationship, she asked to have the client referred to another counselor.

Ward was then expelled from the school.

A lower court sided with the university, but Ward appealed, saying the school had violated her First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and free exercise of religion.

On Friday, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed that Ward could have a valid claim, and sent the case back to a district court for another hearing.

“A reasonable jury could conclude that Ward’s professors ejected her from the counseling program because of hostility toward her speech and faith, not due to a policy against referrals,” the appeals court ruled.

The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which has helped defend Ward, hailed the ruling as a victory for religious freedom.

“No individual should be forced out of their profession solely because of her religious beliefs,” said Eric Rassbach, the Becket Fund’s national litigation director.

The Ypsilanti, Mich.-based university issued a statement noting that the court has not ruled in favor of Ward, but rather called for more legal consideration.

“This case has never been about religion or religious discrimination,” the university said. “It is not about homosexuality or sexual orientation. This case is about what is in the best interest of a person who is in need of counseling.”

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Universal Uclick.

  • thebump

    The school claims that “This case is about what is in the best interest of a person who is in need of counseling.” That claim of course is nonsense. How on earth did the student’s expulsion benefit the patient?

    Would it not be in the patient’s interest to have a therapist whose moral beliefs are compatible?

    This is a blatant and inexcusable case of trampling the student’s freedom of conscience.

  • TopTurtle

    It is in the patient’s best interest to be served by counselors whose professional standards are based on the best of humanity’s psychological knowledge, rather than subject to each counselor’s political beliefs. If a patient wants religious counseling, there are always religious leaders available.

  • thebump

    But according to this case a religious leader who seeks professional training gets expelled. Psychology is not a hard science by any stretch. Ultimately the patient’s best interest is determined by the patient. Why doesn’t a patient have the right to a compatible therapist?