Why Mitt Romney can’t be the Mormon JFK

Mitt Romney faces different circumstances with his Mormon faith than JFK did sixty years ago.

Mitt Romney’s sudden downgrade from Republican frontrunner to potential also-ran coincided with a massive shift of conservative Christians voters in South Carolina to Newt Gingrich’s camp.

Why? Many observers trace it to lingering suspicion among evangelicals — a key Republican constituency — about Romney’s Mormon faith.

And that has led some to suggest that Romney needs to make a speech about his Mormonism along the lines of John F. Kennedy’s defense of his Catholicism to Protestant leaders during the 1960 campaign.

So could Romney pull a Kennedy? Should he?

Mike Huckabee, an evangelical favorite who sought the GOP nod in 2008, told Fox News after Romney’s South Carolina implosion that the time had come for Romney to give it a shot.

“I do think he ought to address it,” Huckabee said, arguing that such a speech would “sort of dismiss it, make it less important.”

But few political observers, and apparently even fewer Romney’s allies, appear to be urging that step, and they have good reasons for taking a wait-and-see approach:

1. Romney has more than a Mormon problem

For one thing, the tracking polls in the GOP contest over the past months have registered more spikes and dips than an erratic electrocardiogram. Romney’s cardiac moment in South Carolina — and his continuing struggle heading into Florida’s Jan. 31 primary — needs to be seen in that context.

“I think it was more a result of Newt Gingrich catching fire combined with a pretty tough week for Mitt on issues like taxes and income,” said David French, a social conservative and Romney ally who with his wife, Nancy, just published a book, “Why Evangelicals Should Support Mitt Romney (and Feel Good About It!).”

“It’s a pretty conventional narrative — at least by the conventions of this very volatile race,” French added. “If there was any blanket anti-Mormon sentiment, then Mitt would not have been up to begin with.”

2. Romney doesn’t need to rally the Mormon base

When Kennedy addressed the Greater Houston Ministerial Association in September 1960, it was only two months before the November election, and he did not have to worry about his Democratic base the way Romney has to worry about securing the GOP base to win the primaries.

Kennedy’s chief task in 1960 actually was not to convert his audience; they were already a lost cause, and he knew it. What the Kennedy campaign hoped to do was to influence the 23 percent of the wider electorate who were still undecided.

“The campaign’s polling showed that yes, if Kennedy could paint himself as a victim of anti-Catholic bigotry, that will move people your way,” said Shaun Casey, a professor of Christian ethics at Wesley Theological Seminary and author of “The Making of a Catholic President: Kennedy vs. Nixon 1960.” And it worked.

Romney’s “religion” problem is about numbers as much as theology. As Casey notes, Kennedy’s other task in Houston was to rally his Catholic base, which he did. But rallying an already strong GOP Mormon base wouldn’t do much for Romney.

While Kennedy had a Catholic population of 40 million behind him — about one-quarter of the electorate, concentrated in key battleground states — Mormons today number just about 2 million, and are geographically concentrated in the Mountain West in mostly reliable red states (with the exception of toss-ups Nevada and Colorado).

Romney already gave a “Houston” speech — and it didn’t work. Back in 2007, Romney was struggling to overcome evangelicals’ doubts about his Mormon faith. While the speech was well received, it didn’t move Iowa caucus-goers one iota back then, and a second speech now would likely not convince suspicious evangelicals in Florida (and beyond).

3. Romney may not want people to know he’s Mormon

By talking about his Mormonism, Romney would call attention to his Mormonism. Politically speaking, that’s a huge risk. Many Americans, and Republicans in particular, tend to consider Mormonism a “cult” — or “super spooky-wooky!” as Broadway’s hit musical, “The Book of Mormon,” puts it. Calling extra attention to Mormon beliefs could just affirm those views, or tell evangelicals who don’t know about Romney’s religion that he is, in fact, a Mormon.

If Romney seeks to legitimize Mormons, he also runs the reviving evangelical concerns about the Mormon “threat.” While many conservative Christians consider Mormons a cult, in real life they are not so odd. They are not the alien “other,” as many in 1960 believed Roman Catholics to be, nor is Romney an African-American with an exotic pedigree, the way Barack Obama was viewed in 2008 (and still is by many in 2012).

The problem is that Mormons are so much like evangelicals, or what evangelicals want to be — clean-cut, disciplined, hard-working, family-loving, flag-waving, church-going conservatives — that many evangelicals seem them as a kind of heretical competition. The fear is that if Romney mainstreams Mormonism, he gives credibility to a potential rival for evangelical souls.

“I do not believe for one moment that if a Mormon like Mitt Romney were elected president he would be a puppet controlled by the Mormon hierarchy,” Hal Gordon, a former speechwriter for Ronald Reagan and Colin Powell, wrote in a recent column.

“But even if he kept his faith completely private, the election of a Mormon president would, ipso facto, swathe Mormonism in a respectability that it has long coveted.”

4. Romney’s liability isn’t necessarily his faith

Romney’s biggest task is convincing conservative Christians that he is a conservative, not that he is a Christian. Evangelicals have shown they are happy to back all sorts of unorthodox candidates (anyone remember Herman Cain?). They never fell for fellow evangelicals Michele Bachmann or Rick Perry, and now they are rushing toward Newt Gingrich, a thrice-married convert to Catholicism.

Evangelicals may not love Mormons, but they are really down on moderates. Indeed, Romney is arguably “not Mormon enough,” Richard Land, a top Southern Baptist official, said on the eve of the South Carolina vote.

“If his stance on life and his stance on marriage had been consistently what the stance of the Mormon church has been, he would have far less doubts among social conservatives,” Land said.

Ralph Reed, head of the Faith and Freedom Coalition and a top evangelical political activist, said he doesn’t think Romney’s Mormonism will necessarily preclude him from winning evangelical votes or the GOP nomination, so he doesn’t need to make the Kennedy speech at this point.

“Bottom line is,” said Reed, “he may need to address it as the campaign proceeds, and he may choose to address it as part of a speech down the road.”

5. What Romney’s real Kennedy moment would look like

“Down the road” may be a good idea. Surveys show that Democrats — still seething over Mormon involvement in California’s Prop 8 fight over gay marriage — are much less likely to accept the idea of a Mormon president than are Republicans, and are less accepting of the idea than even conservative Christians.

So picture this: If Romney can secure the nomination, he could give a speech about his faith next September to an audience of suspicious liberals. By doing so, he would win the hearts and votes of Republicans — including evangelicals — who would see him as the victim of anti-religious bias.

And that would be the real Kennedy moment.

 

  • Carstonio

    A candidate’s religious affiliation shouldn’t matter because as a matter of principle, the affiliation is no one else’s business, even for people seeking public office. It’s not a reliable predictor of the political positions the candidate would or might hold – there are many pro-choice evangelicals and some pro-life atheists. What matters are the positions espoused by the candidate himself or herself.

  • kkammeyer

    I think the article hit the nail on the head – Mr. Romney’s main problem may be that he is not “conservative” enough. However, there is still an undercurrent of anti-Mormon bias, particularly among Evangelicals. The Evangelical members are not the problem – it is their ministers, who see Mormonism as a threat and fan the flames of bigotry. This has been going on for almost 180 years now, ever since the founding of the Mormon Church.

    I can only hope that well-meaning people of all faiths will come together and elect a President who will support the principles this nation was founded upon.

  • MormonismDeception

    Mormonism is a proven cult that has very little to share with global Christianity, other than identifying its name to Jesus Christ. Romney’s presidential bid cannot be compared to that of JFK’s or any other Christian president simply because he hides behind a deliberate LDS facade to deceive people about his belief in biblical Christianity. Mormonism teaches “The Book of Mormon” is “…the most perfect book of scripture” and the Bible is full of errors manufactured by Catholicism. The Bible DOES NOT teach that man’s works of righteousness can earn him salvation and exaltation as A GOD!!

    It’s also important that Americans know that Mormons believe they will some day rescue our government:

    “Joseph Smith, the (LDS) prophet, was inspired to affirm and ratify this truth, and he further predicted that the time would come, when the Constitution of our country would hang as it were by a thread, and that the Latter-day Saints ABOVE ALL OTHER PEOPLE in the world would come to the rescue of that great and glorious palladium of our liberty.” (LDS Conference Report. October 1912, p.10 Salt Lake City, Utah)

    Smith’s prediction has always been one of the many avenues of self-adulation inherent with the teachings of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints”