Gingrich’s Catholic blind spots

Astrid Riecken FOR THE WASHINGTON POST Newt Gingrich, right, listens to the Most Reverend Richard B. Higgins, Auxiliary Bishop of … Continued

Astrid Riecken

FOR THE WASHINGTON POST

Newt Gingrich, right, listens to the Most Reverend Richard B. Higgins, Auxiliary Bishop of the Archdiocese of the Military Services USA, while attending the annual Christmas concert for charity at the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception.

What should Catholics think about Newt Gingrich’s candidacy? Let me take a page from the former speaker’s own pedagogical style and consider this from history.

The Puritans, whom Alexis de Tocqueville credited for defining the American soul, thought that among sinful believers were some few saints predestined by Providence for salvation. Saints manifested their anointment by leading lives of rigid moral perfection. Given the corruption of this world, they thought that only saints should lead and govern.

Even a quick survey of Catholic political cultures reveals that Catholics are not Puritans. With one exception, our saints sinned. Nobody is predestined for salvation and even the worst serial sinners can seek and receive serial forgiveness seven times seventy times. From our perspective, the peccadilloes of Mr. Gingrich’s past in no way disqualify him for governance. His recent conversion to our faith is a poignant reaffirmation of what we believe.

That said, Catholic values are a hard fit for American political candidates—including for Gingrich.

Maybe this is also owing in part to America’s puritanical bent. Puritans thought that government was at best a necessary evil required primarily to combat a greater evil in the world. In this negative conception, the role of government is not that of expansively building civilization in hopes to fulfill the common good but instead the much more limited role of securing order for the private exercise of virtue.

On the other hand, Catholic political thinking aims for more. It advocates a positive view of government in light of what can be accomplished together amidst the richness of divine gifts. With this comes a wide array of responsibilities charged to government, these include: a responsibility to promote life, a responsibility to put the needs of the poor foremost in our measures of policy, a responsibility to steward God’s creation, a responsibility to enrich not merely purses but rather the whole of citizens’ lives, a responsibility to welcome the immigrant, to seek and promote peace, and so on. These responsibilities are not merely moral imperatives for individuals but also our collective responsibilities as a nation.

Mr. Gingrich’s long record in Congress, his many recent policy proposals, and especially the rhetorical “tea party” excesses of some of his remarks on the campaign trail hint at a worldview that is not wholly consonant with traditional Catholic thinking. We might praise his opposition to abortion, for example, but still ask if the government must not also work to reduce the incidence of capital punishment? Does he agree with Catholic teachings about the priority of the needs of the poor in policymaking? About government’s responsibility to promote peace? About the rights of workers to unionize? We might praise his support for marriage, but where is his support for policy efforts to guarantee the kind of living wages that are so necessary for families to thrive? Church leaders have insisted that governments are obliged to assure that all have health care, but Gingrich would turn back the clock on efforts to provide such comprehensive coverage. Unlike most Republicans, Gingrich at least endorses the American Catholic bishops’ insistence that the country provide some path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, but he would limit such amnesty only to those who have lived in America for more than twenty years, which does nothing to address the inhumanity of possibly deporting millions and millions of more recent immigrants. Here as in many other areas, the former speaker struggles.

Unlike the Puritans, Catholics don’t expect saints in politics. We measure good governance not by individual virtue, but by the common good. It’s not Newt Gingrich’s past that should be on Catholic minds.

Stephen Schneck is a board member of Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good.

Read more on Gingrich:

Newt Gingrich: The GOP’s eccentric big thinker and bomb-thrower

Thomas Peters: Gingrich has Catholic credentials, for now

Mathew Schmalz: What kind of Catholic is Newt Gingrich?

  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous

Read More Articles

shutterstock_185995553
How to Debate Christians: Five Ways to Behave and Ten Questions to Answer

Advice for atheists taking on Christian critics.

HIFR
Heaven Hits the Big Screen

How “Heaven is for Real” went from being an unsellable idea to a bestselling book and the inspiration for a Hollywood movie.

shutterstock_186364295
This God’s For You: Jesus and the Good News of Beer

How Jesus partied with a purpose.

egg.jpg
Jesus, Bunnies, and Colored Eggs: An Explanation of Holy Week and Easter

So, Easter is a one-day celebration of Jesus rising from the dead and turning into a bunny, right? Not exactly.

shutterstock_186566975
Hey Bart Ehrman, I’m Obsessed with Jesus, Too — But You’ve Got Him All Wrong

Why the debate over Jesus’ divinity matters.

shutterstock_148333673
Friend or Foe? Learning from Judas About Friendship with Jesus

We call Judas a betrayer. Jesus called him “friend.”

shutterstock_53190298
Fundamentalist Arguments Against Fundamentalism

The all-or-nothing approach to the Bible used by skeptics and fundamentalists alike is flawed.

shutterstock_186795503
The Three Most Surprising Things Jesus Said

Think you know Jesus? Some of his sayings may surprise you.

SONY DSC
Dear Evangelicals, Please Reconsider Your Fight Against Gay Rights

A journalist and longtime observer of American religious culture offers some advice to his evangelical friends.

shutterstock_186090179
How Passover Makes the Impossible Possible

When we place ourselves within the story, we can imagine new realities.

This Passover, We’re Standing at an Unparted Red Sea

We need to ask ourselves: What will be the future of the State of Israel — and what will it require of us?

pews
Just As I Am

My childhood conversion to Christianity was only the first of many.

shutterstock_127731035 (1)
Are Single People the Lepers of Today’s Church?

In an age of rising singlehood, many churches are still focused on being family ministry centers.

2337221655_c1671d2e5e_b
Mysterious Tremors

People like me who have mystical experiences may be encountering some unknown Other. What can we learn about what that Other is?

bible
Five Bible Verses You Need to Stop Misusing

That verse you keep quoting? It may not mean what you think it means.

csl_wall_paper
What C.S. Lewis’ Marriage Can Tell Us About the Gay Marriage Controversy

Why “welcome and wanted” is a biblical response to gay and lesbian couples in evangelical churches.