From Jesus’ socialism to capitalistic Christianity

A truly strange thing has happened to American Christianity. A set of profound contradictions have developed within modern conservative Christianity, … Continued

A truly strange thing has happened to American Christianity. A set of profound contradictions have developed within modern conservative Christianity, big and telling inconsistencies that have long slipped under the radar of public knowledge, and are only now beginning to be explicitly noted by critics of the religious and economic right.

Here is what is peculiar. Many conservative Christians, mostly Protestant but also a number of Catholics, have come to believe and proudly proclaim that the creator of the universe favors free wheeling, deregulated, union busting, minimal taxes especially for wealthy investors, plutocrat-boosting capitalism as the ideal earthly scheme for his human creations. And many of these Christian capitalists are ardent followers of Ayn Rand, who was one of – and many of whose followers are — the most hard-line anti-Christian atheist/s you can get. Meanwhile many Christians who support the capitalist policies associated with social Darwinistic strenuously denounce Darwin’s evolutionary science because it supposedly leads to, well, social Darwinism!

Meanwhile atheists, secularists and evolutionist are denounced as inventing the egalitarian evils of anti-socially Darwinistic socialism and communism. It’s such a weird stew of incongruities that it sets one’s head spinning. Social researchers like myself ask, how did these internal conflict come about? And why are not liberals and progressives doing the logical thing and taking full advantage of the inconsistencies of right wing libertarianism by loudly exposing the contradictions?

To understand why the pro-capitalist stance of many modern religious conservatives is at odds with Christian doctrine we need to start with the Gospels.

Jesus is no free marketeer. Improving one’s earthly financial circumstances is not nearly as critical as preparing for the end times that will arrive at any minute. He does offer substantial encouragement for the poor, and warns the wealthy that they are in grave danger of blowing their prospects of reaching paradise, as per the metaphor of a rich person entering heaven being as difficult as a camel passing through the eye of the needle (a narrow passageway designed to hinder intruders). This caution makes sense: sociological research is confirming that the more securely prosperous individuals and societies are, the more likely they are to lose the faith. A basic point of core Christian doctrine is that the wealthy have no more access to heaven than anyone else (and in fact may have less), offering hope to the impoverished rejected by cults that court the elites. This remains true in Catholicism, in which being poor does not constitute evidence of a personal deficiency, and church authorities decry the excesses of unrestrained capital at the expense of social justice.

But to understand just how non-capitalistic Christianity is supposed to be we turn to the first chapter after the gospels, Acts, which describes the events of the early church. Chapters 2 and 4 state that all “the believers were together and had everything in common. Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need… No one claimed that any of his possessions was his own, but they shared everything they had…. There were no needy persons among them. From time to time those who owned lands or houses sold them, brought the money from the sales and put it at the apostles feet, and it was distributed to anyone as he had need.”

Now folks, that’s outright socialism of the type described millennia later by Marx – who likely got the general idea from the gospels.

The pro-capitalist Christians who are aware of these passages wave them away even though it is the only explicit description of Christian economics in the Bible.

To get just how central collectivism is to Christian canon, consider that the Bible contains the first description of socialism in history. Anti-socialist Christians also claim that the Biblical version was voluntary. Aside from it being obvious that the biblical version of God was not the anti-socialist Christian capitalists commonly proclaim he was, some dark passages in Acts indicate how deeply pro-socialist the New Testament deity is. Chapter 5 details how when a church member fails to turn over all his property to the church “he fell down and died,” when his wife later did the same “she fell down… and died… Great fear seized the whole church and all who heard about these events.”

Dear readers, does this not sound like a form of terror-enforced-communism imposed by a God who thinks that Christians who fail to join the collective are worthy of death? Not only is socialism a Christian invention, so is its extreme communistic variant. The claim by many Christians that Christ hates socialism is untrue, while no explicit description of capitalism is found in the Bible – not surprising because it had not yet evolved.

So how did so much of Christianity come to reject socialism? That is not hard to figure out. In the early Protestant Netherlands, Switzerland and England capital became the dominant economic driver. Of course members of a religion want to think that God approves of what they are up to. So many (but not all) Protestants began to cherry pick those Biblical passages that could be massaged to seemingly support laissez-faire markets while pretty much ignoring those that clearly don’t. This works because, as surveys show, most Christians don’t actually read the bulk of the Bible, and people are mentally skilled at dismissing the awkward passages they do come across. Christians really took the theory that God is pro-capital to its extreme in what has be come the least socialistic and most Jesus-following of the advanced democracies, the USA, where many see the nation as an exceptional, God blessed “Shining City on the Hill” they think stands as the exemplar of Godly capitalism to the world.

In Puritan doctrine only the few destined for heaven can enjoy earthly wealth – that’s why there aren’t many rich folks – and poverty is the widespread sign of being destined for hell. But Puritanism was too dour for most Americans, so the notion that God wants his many followers to become as well-heeled as possible really took off with the emergence of the celebratory, self help oriented evangelical and Pentecostal Prosperity Christianity that the likes of Amy McPherson began to promote at the same time the modern corporate-consumer culture arose after the first world war.

The intellectual foundations for the alliance between capital and God were laid after the second world war by Catholic William Buckley, who, like some others contrived to maneuver around their churches’ skepticism about mercantile interests, worked to convert frugal church goers into materialistic consumers who spend their Sundays watching spectator sports and charging up interest loaded debt at the mall.

Back in the 1800s the non-theist Herbert Spencer adapted the evolutionary science developed by Darwin into what has become known as social Darwinism — even though the biologist had little interest in socioeconomic issues, as well as a live and let live attitude about religion. It was Spencer who coined the term “survival of the fittest” that Darwin worked into later editions of his biology texts. Many Christians – logically concerned at the threat that a naturalistic explanation of human origins posed for popular belief in a supernatural creator – reacted by blaming harsh Darwinian biology for creating the similarly harsh “Darwinian” socioeconomics that they saw as responsible for the ills of the modern world.

At the same time socialists and communists were adapting those aspects of evolutionary science that they liked (a god-free origin of our world) while rejecting those they did not (the anti-egalitarianism integral to survival of the fittest free markets caused Marx and Engels to denounce evolution as a “bitter satire” on man and nature, and Stalin would ban pre-deterministic genetics for contradicting the blank slate theory of communism). While the communists drove the reasonable concept of social equality into the ground, Ayn Rand did the same with individual liberty. Because she hated the teeniest expression of the socialism, and because the concept was in the archaic Bible long before some non-theists decided it was the wave of the future, she promoted an anti-Christian, pro-evolution atheism so extreme that even most atheists including myself reject her claim to have philosophically absolutely disproved the existence of any god. But many influential conservative Christians have embraced her expressly atheistic theory of Objectivism that in her books such as The Virtue of Selfishness, they propose that government must be shrunk to a bare minimum so socially Darwinist that it dances with anarchy. Only then can entrepreneurial greed have the free run that liberty demands. Hence Rand’s more nobly titled Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead are required reading for the staff of Paul Ryan.

Reagan’s economic advisor, Milton Friedman, was an anti-religious Objectivist Rand devotee. So is Alan Greenspan. Skeptics Penn and Teller and Michael Shermer are atheistic libertarians. In the Randian hyper-materialistic world those who are on the financial make are the exalted makers, the impoverished that accept tax payer assistance are parasitic takers who need to fend for themselves. A radical modernist ideology in greater antithesis to the traditional scriptural favoring of the poor over the rich can hardly be imagined. Yet the economics of the plutocratic Republican Party that embraces the Christian, anti-Darwinist creationist right are essentially those of the uberatheist, anti-creationist, Darwin-adoring Christianity-loathing Ayn Rand. So we have Christian creationists like Jay Richards writing books titled Money, Greed, and God: Why Capitalism Is the Solution and Not the Problem. Can a stranger amalgam of opposing opinions be devised?

What I do not get from a sociological perspective is why — rather than letting the right avoid being called out for decade after decade — progressives from pious to atheist (most being liberals) as well as the mainstream news media have not been exposing the fascinating incoherence of the right wing’s anti-Darwinian biology, pro-Darwinian economics? Logically Stewart, Maddow, Olbermann, Maher et al. should on a regular basis challenge Christian libertarians on how Palin, Bachmann, Coulter, Beck, Limbaugh, Gingrich et al. can reject as ungodly evil the hard line socialism that is explicitly enforced by their God in the Bible they profess to read and believe? And how can those libertarians who manage to be devout Christians fawn over Ayn Rand whose entire philosophy is a condemnation of Christian doctrine? Also that O’Reilly and Bennett explain how they can continue to be in opposition to their pope who issued the newest encyclical reaffirming the churches opposition to libertarian economics. And ask if a person opposes evolution because it leads to ungodly societal chaos then how can the same person endorse the economics that most closely replicate biological evolution? It does not make practical sense for progressives to fail to use the deep, hypocritical conflicts that mar the right to try to split the movement at its weakest links. The right cannot reply in kind because progressives are less internally conflicted; although liberals too range from devout to atheist they share a secular sense of social tolerance, concur that the gospels are economically progressive, and agree that organisms have evolved over deep time.

In educational terms mainstream press coverage of the issue would be a public service giving the public the information it needs to decide whether or not current conservatism is fatally disingenuous. In a Washington Post column liberal Catholic E. J. Dionne Jr. got things rolling by pointing out that the Rand whose books so many Christian conservatives treat as scripture was a flaming atheist.

It’s a start.

And why are progressives not regularly putting forward the fast growing body of technical research proving that it is the most secular, liberal democracies that are enjoying the overall best socioeconomic circumstances in history, including lower rates of homicide, incarceration, juvenile and adult mortality, STD infections, abortion, teen pregnancy, mental illness, illicit drug use, and so on compared to the more libertarian USA, and superior levels of economic security, upward mobility and education?

And finally, if you don’t like socialism and communism stop blaming atheists and other secularists for concocting egalitarian collectivism backed by fear of death. It got its start long ago in the Good Book.

Gregory Paul is an independent researcher in sociology and evolution. He wrote this article for washingtonpost.com/onfaith.

His previous posts for the Washington Post include:


Why do Americans dislike atheists?


Atheists fed up? Believe it!



More On Faith:

Jay Richards responds: Was Jesus a socialist?

About

  • fpscott

    interesting piece though the author is misinformed re marx, engels and darwin…they both embraced darwin and his theory…the writer is confusing social darwinism – which marx and engels would certainly have opposed – with darwinism…otherwise, a nice piece but expecting the liberals he advises to criticize capitalism is like expecting mrs clinton to have asked for a divorce before running for president…
    fs

  • blspro

    “capitalist policies associated with social Darwinistic”

    And who ‘associates’ the one with the other? Oh yeah, those who don’t like “capitalist policies”.

    “atheists, secularists and evolutionist are denounced as inventing the egalitarian evils”

    And that can’t be true because we all know that “atheists” etc all share the exact same philosophy. Thus it is impossible for some of them to have ‘invented’ egalitarian evils of communism etc while others were capitalistic.

    “This caution makes sense: sociological research is confirming that the more securely prosperous individuals and societies are, the more likely they are to lose the faith.”

    So if Christians are worried about the souls of the poor, the last thing they should do is provide them charity and other material wealth! Keeping them poor is the faithful thing for Christians to do! Otherwise they endanger the eternal souls of the poor!

    Thanks for pointing that out!

    “There were no needy persons among them.”

    Which demonstrates this is pure fantasy.

    “Not only is socialism a Christian invention, so is its extreme communistic variant.”

    LOL. So much for philosophic history. Christianity did not invent socialism, communism, etc. Plato is properly recognized as the father of these forms of statism.

    I have to give up at this point. There is simply TOO much to Fisk here.

  • editor5

    If you’re just joining the comments, allow me to summarize it for you:

    Non-conservative Christian argument: “Hey, if you’re going to follow the Bible to letter, it seems like you should be further to the left politically in how you treat the poor.”

    Conservative Christian argument: “Screw you. We’ll do what we want.”

  • bacchuswitch

    Best read in a long time. I agree completely.

  • freenotseperate

    Actually, conservative christian argument is that we do not believe the government should legalize theft under the guise of caring for the poor.

  • Bodine666

    That’s very christian like. Just ask baby jesus. Or check out the bible that christians so often thump.

    Someone, perhaps Mark Twain, maybe not, described the bible as the least read best seller of all times. Take a look at christians in America and you could not disagree.

  • badpuppet

    Thank you for sharing these much-needed and verifiable points. Unfortunately, you preach to the choir. Those who would benefit most from taking this wisdom to heart inevitably resort to the tl;dr argument once they realize their embedded assumptions are being threatened.

  • freenotseperate

    I don’t understand. What was unChristian? Christians all over the world do things for the poor, and those affected by disaster. This is all done voluntarily, not under law by the government. Why is it so hard for you to separate this? Government telling people to care for the poor through legislation is legalized theft, Christians giving of their time and goods voluntarily is charity. I am for the latter!

  • lanbr1

    Mr. Paul, you really got hung up in your underwear on this article. Hope you made a lot of money with it.

  • Hegemon

    Most of what you said is absolutely true. However, your understanding of Acts chapter five and subsequent description of God is wrong and not a little irreverent. The husband and wife died because they lied to the Holy Spirit of God. Clearly God does not force us to convert on pain of death. If you want (as I do) to change the minds of today’s Christians, you will need to be more diplomatic. You are not going to be making any headway by insulting them.

  • blspro

    “Why is it so hard for you to separate this?”

    Because it removes the government’s gun from their hands, leaving them powerless to FORCE others to submit to their will. Giving up the power to INITIATE force is something they will NEVER do.

  • FreeSpeechZone1

    Thank you for writing this. I have been contemplating writing a book entitled—or maybe a chapter in a book on Corporate Takeover of democracy—”Jesus Was a Democrat.” I should ask you to write that chapter.

    But here is the next piece to logically follow what you have written here. Point out the contradiction in how the fake-Christian radcons murder and holler in the name of pro-birth…..while being totally against life—wars, no health care for people, etc. The far right pro-birth crowd also does not believe in pre-natal care and does not believe in pediatric care. The most amazing contradiction is that these are the people who hate minorities and think all of them are lazy and looking for a government handout—yet, at the same time they are vehement that all unwanted babies, welfare babies and future drains on society must be birthed, or else!

  • FreeSpeechZone1

    Here is the next piece to logically follow what you have written here. Point out the contradiction in how the fake-Christian radcons murder doctors, intimidate pregnant teens and raise righteous hell in the name of pro-birth…..while being totally against life—wars, no health care for people, no laws to enforce clean air, safe water, safe food, etc. The far right pro-birth crowd also does not believe in pre-natal care and does not believe in pediatric care. The most amazing contradiction is that these are the people who hate minorities and think all of them are lazy and looking for a government handout. They are totally against providing contraceptives and female health care and birth control information; that would be another example of a government handout. Yet, at the same time they are vehement that all unwanted babies, welfare babies and future drains on society must be birthed, or else! How much more cost efficient it would be to provide birth control and wellness care than to support, as they would see it, another slug on society for its life!

  • r74quinn

    A better question is: “Why don’t secularists leave socialism to the Christians and simply ebrace a reason-based approach to philosophy to supporting human life on Earth, a la Ayn Rand’s?”

  • richzubaty

    Jesus was the first Socialist according to Hugo Chavez…but I have been saying this stuff for a decade in my books and articles. I’m THRILLED mainstream media finally caught up. It’s a crime of omission that Left wing commentators do not daily take right wing Christians to task for not respecting the communal and socialist origins of their own religion. The great revolution Jesus brought to history was Socialism. Not virgin births or consciousness after death – the Greeks had already proposed that. Not smashing the heads of your enemies’ babies on rocks, as the Pslams advise. Treating your neighbor as you want to be treated. People before profit. Socialism.

  • richzubaty

    Jesus was the first Socialist according to Hugo Chavez…but I have been saying this stuff for a decade in my books and articles. I’m THRILLED mainstream media finally caught up. It’s a crime of omission that Left wing commentators do not daily take right wing Christians to task for not respecting the communal and socialist origins of their own religion. The great revolution Jesus brought to history was Socialism. Not virgin births or consciousness after death – the Greeks had already proposed that. Not smashing the heads of your enemies’ babies on rocks, as the Pslams advise. Treating your neighbor as you want to be treated. People before profit. Socialism.

  • freenotseperate

    So are you agreeing or disagreeing with me?

  • AtticusDogsbody

    Because Rand’s philosophy was not based on reason, it was based on greed and greed isn’t reasonable.

  • jimhbg

    Why don’t progressives call out…?

    Easy answer. Show me a Republican who can be swayed by logic or reason, and I’ll show you a….a…well, a Democrat!

  • freenotseperate

    Nevermind blspro, I misread your entry.

  • tlhheller

    I’ve wondered about us silent progressives on these very issues–starting ‘way back when GW was forming facts around policy. I think it’s because the Rs and their godheads–beginning with Rove–are so blatant about making up their own truths that it takes all of the air out of the room. Who can speak truth into a vacuum? and why? you might as well ship your views to outer space. In our well-polarized world. there’s the awful fact that the American political mind has been mushed into the submission [right, Michelle] of hens listening to the Fox. As for the progressives, we threw in with Obama, and now we’re stuck with not only less than what we bargained for but darn near the same thing we already had–which is the big corporatism that is actually running things regardless of party or religion or ideology. It’s all about power, and they’ve got it, regardless of political outcomes. So, if it’s true that despair was at the root of it, the UK kids who have rioted themselves into senseless anarchy unfortunately may have more integrity than the rest of us … but I can’t go there either. So there’s a lot of tacit screaming going on out here, and at least Mr. Paul has given us a good look at the conditions promoting our helpless outrage.

  • ColleenHarper

    Because secularists have found that we extend our concept of tribe to all humans, not merely those select few who are in our little clique. We therefore want all our brothers and sisters to have what is necessary to survive and flourish – ALL humans, not merely those who have the wherewithal to profit off the sweat of others.

  • DOEJN

    I think this is a great piece that would benefit from proofreading and editing out the many typos and errors. A more polished version would be more convincing to those not already inclined to see things the way you do.

  • Devil Dog

    You are a complete idiot, but nice try. Socialism IS done by force, Christ taught Individual redemption. Do you think the soviet union was model of Christianity?

Read More Articles

emptytomb
God’s Not Dead? Why the Good News Is Better than That

The resurrection of Jesus is not a matter of private faith — it’s a proclamation for the whole world.

noplaceonearth
An Untold Story of Bondage to Freedom: Passover 1943

How a foxhole that led to a 77-mile cave system saved the lives of 38 Ukrainian Jews during the Holocaust.

shutterstock_148333673
Friend or Foe? Learning from Judas About Friendship with Jesus

We call Judas a betrayer. Jesus called him “friend.”

shutterstock_53190298
Fundamentalist Arguments Against Fundamentalism

The all-or-nothing approach to the Bible used by skeptics and fundamentalists alike is flawed.

shutterstock_186795503
The Three Most Surprising Things Jesus Said

Think you know Jesus? Some of his sayings may surprise you.

colbert
Top 10 Reasons We’re Glad A Catholic Colbert Is Taking Over Letterman’s “Late Show”

How might we love Stephen Colbert as the “Late Show” host? Let us count the ways.

shutterstock_185995553
How to Debate Christians: Five Ways to Behave and Ten Questions to Answer

Advice for atheists taking on Christian critics.

HIFR
Heaven Hits the Big Screen

How “Heaven is for Real” went from being an unsellable idea to a bestselling book and the inspiration for a Hollywood movie.

shutterstock_186364295
This God’s For You: Jesus and the Good News of Beer

How Jesus partied with a purpose.

egg.jpg
Jesus, Bunnies, and Colored Eggs: An Explanation of Holy Week and Easter

So, Easter is a one-day celebration of Jesus rising from the dead and turning into a bunny, right? Not exactly.

SONY DSC
Dear Evangelicals, Please Reconsider Your Fight Against Gay Rights

A journalist and longtime observer of American religious culture offers some advice to his evangelical friends.