Many kinds of faith, many kinds of doubt

Non-believing clergy should be “moved out,” but there are other forms of doubt in the pulpit to consider.

Q:What should pastors do if they no longer hold the defining beliefs of their denomination? Do clergy have a moral obligation not to challenge the sincere faith of their parishioners? If this requires them to dissemble from the pulpit, doesn’t this create systematic hypocrisy at the center of religion? What would you want your pastor to do with his or her personal doubts or loss of faith?

The last thing one would want to do is encourage “bad faith,” which would appear or occur if someone simply “pretended” faith in order to hold a clergy job–not the most alluring way to find financial security, high prestige, or deal with one’s insecurities in any case. Anything done to help bad-faith clerics move along and out would be good for congregations and causes of truth and integrity. I suppose there’s some of that going around, but it’s a moral issue that afflicts clergy and laity alike, but should not be the form of un-faith that monopolizes the discourse.

There are more interesting kinds of doubt. Some of them have to do with details of the defining faith of their denomination. How does one define what is defining? For example, when I was ordained as a Lutheran I promised to be faithful to the Lutheran “confessions,” seeing them being faithful to the Scriptures. Seminary professors delighted in showing us that somewhere in one of them it taught that garlic applied to magnets led them to lose their magnetism (or gain more; I don’t remember). I think that if laity who were told that and then learned that their preacher didn’t agree would see good faith in her stance.

The confessions also teach that the Pope is the Antichrist, and some Lutheran bodies still have that on the books. And then along comes Pope John XXIII, and Lutheran churches mourned when he died. The conservative head of a conservative Lutheran body referred to Pope John Paul II as “dear brother in Christ” for his anti-abortion stance. How could the Antichrist be so addressed What was and is defining in these cases

Now, there are certainly beliefs that do define. Jose Ortega y Gasset spoke of “creencias,” not as “ideas that you hold” but “ideas that you are.” In my tribe the fact that God loves the unlovable, accepts the unacceptable, and that we don’t earn or merit grace is a defining belief.. Anyone who studies Lutheran sermons will often find the fallible, mortal, limited, but in-good-faith preacher lapsing into “you gotta” language, yet he or she would not consider such lapses to be defining. But if one decides that God’s love is not shown in Christ and that we have to be busy-busy impressing God would likely want to step away.

There are many kinds of doubt. The question is often posed cognitively: does the preacher assent to this or that proposition? That is nowhere near what most experience believers experience as doubt. If that were the vital issues, the company of those I call “virtuosos of doubt” would multiply. I know you can make a splash by showing how daring you are by remaining in a faith-tradition and each week parading how deliciously you balance on the tight rope between faith as agreement and doubt as disagreement. A virtuoso! All the others seem dull by contrast.

Most congregations have matured beyond the point where they need their doubts to be nurtured each week. They are more serious than that. They care about the bone-deep doubt that can come in five-second flashes, five-decade undertones of living faith, or any other way which challenges their very existence and all that they hold dear. Good preachers live with such doubt enough that their people welcome the way they find affirmation. Paul Tillich wrote that doubt is not the enemy of faith; it is part of faith. Martin Luther saw doubt as the fuel off which faith feeds. He believed that bone-deep doubt (an untranslatable word “Anfechtung”) was a temptation to doubt that did not come from the devil but from God. So something good had to come of it.

Some congregations may want as preachers some unthinking automatons, some wind-up robots who are never assailed or enriched by doubt, people who can spout the “defining doctrines” and go hunting for and purging others who they think deviate a bit. Millions of others like to be ministered to by real men and women who share their doubts and faith and see God working through both in a world where the lines are never totally and unwaveringly clear. That, they believe and show that they believe, is the world where divine grace is sought, preached, believed in, and lived.

Photo courtesy of Flickr, James Emery


  • lepidopteryx

    One of the things that I love about the minister at my UU church is that he encourages and models healthy skepticism about everything, including – nay, especially – one’s own beliefs. We do not expect him to follow or even to profess belief in every scrap of UU doctrine, nor does he expect any member of the congregation to.

  • NaN_

    Hey, Newsong, lay off the sauce.

  • NorwegianShooter

    Marty: As others have noted, including “doubts” in the questions undermined the entire point of Dennett’s report. Reams of reams have been filled with the question of doubt and faith. However, the issue here is skepticism. How did these former preachers lose their faith (not express doubt) and what do they do now?Lepid: As an UU myself, I know UUism is non-creedal, but there are some things that don’t fly. Claiming that it is even possible to “profess belief in every scrap of UU doctrine” is one of them. How do you define belief and what doctrine are you talking about? The Seven Principles?

  • Schaum

    Newsong1:A psychotic break involves a disruption of your ability to accurately perceive reality. It may involve hallucinations or delusions as well as changes in the form of thoughts you have. One’s behavior can also be impacted with gross disorganization or bizarre actions. It can be short term or become long standing and chronic.There are a variety of treatment methodologies utilized to deal with individuals who are psychotic. The cause or etiology of the illness is significant. Treatment would need to be based on causation. Trauma, drug abuse, genetic predisposition, head injuries, organic illnesses can all bring about a psychotic break, yet they are all quite different. Treatment would also be different.

Read More Articles

Valle Header Art
My Life Depended on the Very Act of Writing

How I was saved by writing about God and cancer.

Sociologist: Religion Can Predict Sexual Behavior

“Religion and sex are tracking each other like never before,” says sociologist Mark Regnerus.

The Internet Is Not Killing Religion. So What Is?

Why is religion in decline in the modern world? And what can save it?

river dusk
Cleaner, Lighter, Closer

What’s a fella got to do to be baptized?

Magical Thinking and the Canonization of Two Popes

Why Pope Francis is canonizing two popes for all of the world wide web to see.

An Ayatollah’s Gift to Baha’is, Iran’s Largest Religious Minority

An ayatollah offers a beautiful symbolic gesture against a backdrop of violent persecution.

Screenshot 2014-04-23 11.40.54
Atheists Bad, Christians Good: A Review of “God’s Not Dead”

A smug Christian movie about smug atheists leads to an inevitable happy ending.

Ten Ways to Make Your Church Autism-Friendly

The author of the Church of England’s autism guidelines shares advice any church can follow.

Pope Francis: Stop the Culture of Waste

What is the human cost of our tendency to throw away?

chapel door
“Sometimes You Find Something Quiet and Holy”: A New York Story

In a hidden, underground sanctuary, we were all together for a few minutes in this sweet and holy mystery.

Mary Magdalene, the Closest Friend of Jesus

She’s been ignored, dismissed, and misunderstood. But the story of Easter makes it clear that Mary was Jesus’ most faithful friend.

From Passover to Easter: Why I’m Grateful to be Jewish, Christian, and Alive

Passover with friends. Easter with family. It’s almost enough to make you believe in God.

Top 10 Reasons We’re Glad A Catholic Colbert Is Taking Over Letterman’s “Late Show”

How might we love Stephen Colbert as the “Late Show” host? Let us count the ways.

God’s Not Dead? Why the Good News Is Better than That

The resurrection of Jesus is not a matter of private faith — it’s a proclamation for the whole world.

The Three Most Surprising Things Jesus Said

Think you know Jesus? Some of his sayings may surprise you.

Jesus, Bunnies, and Colored Eggs: An Explanation of Holy Week and Easter

So, Easter is a one-day celebration of Jesus rising from the dead and turning into a bunny, right? Not exactly.